Fartyqueef: Nipples in a drawing does NOT make it pornographic unless you are 11 and you've never seen a girl before. The purpose of porn is for sexual excitement. A drawing that happens to have nipples, therefor, does not make it porn.
Anonymous2: Titanium has a better standard than you. There is plenty of vagoo sex on here that is not sexually exciting, hence all the people who are forced to draw extreme shit like guro and futa in order to get their rocks off. Normal porn does not do it for them anymore.
Fartyqueef: Whether someone is a mod or not doesn't change the literal definition of pornography. I'm simply saying there's nothing pornographic about this image. It isn't *trying* to sexually excite. It doesn't matter if it succeeds either way. It's just not porn.
craggle: i consider this porn by the rules of the site. i don't know what the artist was intending, and neither do you. i do know that the nipples could easily have been left out or obscured by larger feathers, and yet they were drawn in anyway, which seems deliberate.
Anonymous3: Fartyqueef chose his name well. Go proudly into that good night, Fartyqueef, even though your opinion is stupid and your penis is so bruised from fappan that you can't get it up over nipples anymore. We salute you, with our nipple-driven boners.
(But not for this pic, 'cause that Na'vi is kinda ugly. Is that even Ney'tiri?)
- Reply
- Reply
(But not for this pic, 'cause that Na'vi is kinda ugly. Is that even Ney'tiri?)