Anonymous1: meh, not haters, there are feasible points of why this is not well made.
Note how Nancher repeat the same poses?
or how he doesn't want to show the hands or feet? or the guy who is in the background?(not because is gay or doesn't have anything to do with the action in the picture) it's because he doesn't know how to do it (looks like he got butthurted by the critic of the rouge pic)
SonofX51: Well obviously. He has a ton of mistakes in his stuff. But I still like it he's got a good thing goin' on with the way he draws the characters. I only wish he could draw them right in poses like these and would get rid of that annoying grain filter.
SonofX51: You'll find that I'm an honest man. I'm a budding writer as well, so I always write like this. I try to be critical but I won't hate a picture for a few mistakes when it comes to images like this.
Anonymous4: Nancher is not that bad. Especially when you consider how much shit get's posted here daily, he's one of the better ones. No he's not perfect, but who is? He has still a way to go but in time I think he could really become something.
But it's a "fad" here to bash on him which makes the users on this site equally, if not more, childish. Anon3.
Anonymous5: ^Sure, many act childish with their Nancher hate, but most have still a point somehow. I doubt that all want him to stop but him rather listen to the critique and improve.
*runs as Nancher haters storm the comments*
Note how Nancher repeat the same poses?
or how he doesn't want to show the hands or feet? or the guy who is in the background?(not because is gay or doesn't have anything to do with the action in the picture) it's because he doesn't know how to do it (looks like he got butthurted by the critic of the rouge pic)
Hmm, a positive conversation on paheal? Amazing!
But it's a "fad" here to bash on him which makes the users on this site equally, if not more, childish. Anon3.
Or maybe, thats... -gasp- his *style*?