The_Thinking_Dead: You're right Futurama_Freak1, despite looking exactly like existing and well known character Michelle, that's plainly not her. I mean, Michelle has clothes, this woman is naked. See? Different.
Srsly though that's plainly Michelle. I mean, go google up a picture of her, then look at this, and tell me that's not obviously her.
marcusabroad: He's telling the artist how strongly, in his eyes, this character resembles an existing futurama character, by way of explaining the confusion other posters have had. Artist is taking this indirect criticism on the chin in his typically measured, stoical ozzie fashion.
Zorviva: The woman who sent you a photograph only had three fingers (and a thumb)? What a horrible deformity to go through life with... not to mention looking like Matt Groening drew her.
marcusabroad: That's pretty much my point, freak - you're not exactly heat resistant when it comes to _any_ form of critical comment beyond 'wow, awesome job!':\
anomalous: It isn't really criticism at all. It's merely an observation that the character depicted, which is suppose to be based upon a living person, very closely resembles an existing character.
marcusabroad: Dude, hand on heart: you very _seldom_ scale your responses to criticism at all proportionately, and your unsolicited crits on various forums are often just unpleasant, even for a 3rd party to read.
Anonymous6: im gonna have to agree with marcus on this one :/
you do good stuff, but try to be a little more open to harmless, casual observation, if not criticism. it looks like Michele. so maybe the girl looked like Michele?
The_Thinking_Dead: Well, I didn't directly say that the artist was wrong in saying it's a woman who sent him pictures of herself to be drawn into the picture.
In theory, the woman who sent him the picture could in fact BE Michelle herself. In which case, tagging her would make sense. Also possible, it's Michelle's twin. Also possible, you've watched so much Futurama that now when you see people from real life, you render them down to their Futurama Character equivalent, and the woman who sent you the pictures looked kind of like Michelle, so you drew Michelle to represent her. Also possible... you drew Michelle and it's not a request picture.
Anonymous8: Yeah Anon7 is right, you guys are fucking retarded. It honestly doesn't even really look like Michelle, like I could see where you'd get that impression but he even told you guys it wasn't to begin with.
marcus was jus bein a dick cause hes blind from all the cum he sprays in his face.
Anonymous9: Christ all this bitchingover Futurama porn. Either enjoy it or get off the site and quit your bitching. And In my opinion this woman doesn't look incredibly similar to Michelle. This woman looks slightly Irish to me
Anonymous11: Well another great piece of art ruined by retarded, blind, argumentative idiots that are incapable of "Leave something nice or nothing" rule.Marcus go fuck yourself, idiotic stirrer, a couple of the anon's are just twats, trying to start a fight, and FF1, the artist that doesn't like unnecessary, prolonged moaning.Good pic FF1.
Anonymous12: Ya know if you change the hair color to blonde she would look like Colleen from the Futurama Movie The Beast With A Billion Backs. Even though it is not clearly not Michelle or Colleen but the girl who wanted Futurama_Freak1 to draw this picture for her. Futurama_Freak1 please could you maybe do a variant of this picture of the brown haired girl and make her hair color blonde and make it look like Colleen from the Futurama Movie The Beast With A Billion Backs. Anyone agree with me on this idea of mine.
Anonymous17: a whole lot of arguing and not a lot of fapping! still, artist was unnecessarily condescending, priggish and rude. fact. drawing isnt michelle. fact. not every character on this site DOE look like their intended character and simply asking a question doesnt demand an instand blasting when a simple "neither, its a real life person as stated above" would have aboided ALL of this and not interrupted my wank by blasting all of you... fact. *recomences wank* FAP FAP FAP FAP
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Srsly though that's plainly Michelle. I mean, go google up a picture of her, then look at this, and tell me that's not obviously her.
- Reply
It looks exactly like the women who sent me photographs of herself, then I drew it.
Great pic FF
, not you.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Get over yourself.
- Reply
No one's had to get over me.
- Reply
you do good stuff, but try to be a little more open to harmless, casual observation, if not criticism. it looks like Michele. so maybe the girl looked like Michele?
- Reply
I just clearly stated that it was in fact not Michelle, I didn't say it doesn't look like her.
SlippyTheToad: Is that Michelle or the woman that made the request?
Futurama_Freak1: I'm sorry but how on earth could you get confused about that.
Futurama_Freak1: Note to taggers: It isn't Michelle, Learn to fucking read.
In theory, the woman who sent him the picture could in fact BE Michelle herself. In which case, tagging her would make sense. Also possible, it's Michelle's twin. Also possible, you've watched so much Futurama that now when you see people from real life, you render them down to their Futurama Character equivalent, and the woman who sent you the pictures looked kind of like Michelle, so you drew Michelle to represent her. Also possible... you drew Michelle and it's not a request picture.
You get the picture.
- Reply
marcus was jus bein a dick cause hes blind from all the cum he sprays in his face.
- Reply
- Reply