actually, i just figured it'd be in the spirit of rule 63, since none of the jawas looked at all feminine, a superfeminine jawa is more rule_63 in spirit than not. but i don't really care.
craggle: well, duh, a1. i'm saying that creating a "sexy female version" of a race without any examples of obviously feminine members feels to me more like the spirit of rule 63.
let's put it this way. say this actually WAS how female jawas looked. that would mean that there have never been female jawas ever seen in star wars. which basically means they don't actually exist at all - in terms of star wars canon, female jawas literally do not exist. so then this would be rule 63 of the jawas that do exist in star wars canon.
like i said i don't really care, i'm just arguing for the sake of arguing. i think a case can be made for either side.
Battle_Droid: Actually, there are female Jawas, I can give you names of some, but there were female jawas in Jabbas palace, but you couldn’t tell their gender.
actually, i just figured it'd be in the spirit of rule 63, since none of the jawas looked at all feminine, a superfeminine jawa is more rule_63 in spirit than not. but i don't really care.
Also craggle, do female crocodiles look ultra feminine?
I'm just saying that things don't have to be "feminine" looking to be female.
let's put it this way. say this actually WAS how female jawas looked. that would mean that there have never been female jawas ever seen in star wars. which basically means they don't actually exist at all - in terms of star wars canon, female jawas literally do not exist. so then this would be rule 63 of the jawas that do exist in star wars canon.
like i said i don't really care, i'm just arguing for the sake of arguing. i think a case can be made for either side.
- Reply
- Reply
Khea Nkuul. They both were at Jabbas palace.
- Reply