Please read our Rules and continue to report content that violates our rules on underage content.
main image
Uploadergudo,
TagsMami_Tomoe, Puella_Magi_Madoka_Magica
Source Link
Unknown
LockedNo
Info400x600 // 39KB // jpg
- Reply
kyle724: I came.
- Reply
Evil_Lord_Proteus: DOes this really constitute as rule 34?
- Reply
Anonymous1: No. No it doesn't.
- Reply
Anonymous2(1): It's like seeing a car wreck. This just does nothing for me.
- Reply
Anonymous3(1): Not unless you're into ink splotches.
- Reply
gudo: @Evil Lord Proteus - there's a nipple, it's porn
- Reply
Anonymous4: Fuck, I see vag. It's porn. Also, now I'm hungry.
- Reply
Killamajig: Always worth remembering that the definitions used on R34 are COMPLETELY BUGFUCK INSANE.
Highly sexual situation where you can't see anything due to image composition, even if that manages to make it hotter? "Not porn".
Completely unsexual situation with a visible nipple? "Porn".

This is a fine example. Somewhere there's a guy with a body in his freezer jerking it to this in between deleting arousing but not explicit images.
I'm still amazed there aren't any photos of the Auschwitz mass graves under the 'history' tag. Most of the corpses in those are nude.
avatar
- Reply
ThatsAkoolStoryBro: i was inclined to make fun of killa due to my sarcastic attitude, but i have to agree. its kind of stupid some of the stuff that passes here. like this, and those pics that were drawn in paint in 5 seconds that barely even look like a rough resemblance of the character in the tag. *sigh* but back on topic.

FFS, someone left a body on my candy again. >_>
- Reply
Spoonman: Mmm... Strawberry.
avatar
- Reply
SpunkMaster69: Not much left, but I'll make do with what I've got.


Report an ad?