d-feather: I was bored last night, so I [cndhpr]ized >>6212606 as well as the Lincolnless version from >>6214284. I also fixed Lincoln's missing stray hairs here and included alternate versions where, like in [cndhpr]'s other edits, Leni's areolae are tan.
IffrytusMasakado: @d-feather: i think it's because you've made insignificant edits to a pic and put your name on it. If you stopped putting your name on the pic the downvotes would probably stop.
d-feather: @IffrytusMasakado:
>"it looks objectively worse than the original"
That's what I get for trying to do edits a la [cndhpr]...
>"If you stopped putting your name on the pic"
I do that because I bother to credit the original artist in my edits. Now about the stuff I didn't edit, can you explain why those get bad scores despite being by actually good artists aside from someone with deeper pockets than me doing it because I keep bitching about who and what he commissions? See >>6226582 as an example of what I mean.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
>"it looks objectively worse than the original"
That's what I get for trying to do edits a la [cndhpr]...
>"If you stopped putting your name on the pic"
I do that because I bother to credit the original artist in my edits. Now about the stuff I didn't edit, can you explain why those get bad scores despite being by actually good artists aside from someone with deeper pockets than me doing it because I keep bitching about who and what he commissions? See >>6226582 as an example of what I mean.
- Reply