Zvantastika: ^I think the rule only applies to non-pornographic material so there should be porn of EVERYTHING... or you can say it's 34 as long as the pic is not drawn by the artist that invented the character or something
craggle: this pic counts as valid 34 because of fleur delacour, regardless.
as for characters from pornographic work, no, they alone aren't allowed, nor do they get tagged when they exist in a valid work (with some possible exceptions, say a work that regularly shows tits won't be allowed for tit-shots, but if someone draws the main character fucking, that's allowed).
you may technically still call it 34, but it's 34 that's not allowed on the site, like 34 of animals alone (which if we didn't forbid it would lead to us getting drowned in furry art), or celebrity fakes that aren't 'in character' (which i still wish we allowed, but whatever).
- Reply
- Reply
as for characters from pornographic work, no, they alone aren't allowed, nor do they get tagged when they exist in a valid work (with some possible exceptions, say a work that regularly shows tits won't be allowed for tit-shots, but if someone draws the main character fucking, that's allowed).
you may technically still call it 34, but it's 34 that's not allowed on the site, like 34 of animals alone (which if we didn't forbid it would lead to us getting drowned in furry art), or celebrity fakes that aren't 'in character' (which i still wish we allowed, but whatever).
- Reply