An_Onymous: Also, I hate to spoil people's fun, but might this possibly be too realistic a depiction of a child (or, if we want to get technical, a being who looks like a child) to be legal here, given the cockfondlage? I'm not saying it necessarily is, just that it's close enough to make me wonder.
Titanium: An Onymous - My understanding is that the law is aimed at shoops that are "vitually indistinguishable from the real thing" or something like that.
This is fine. Read the US Supreme Court's 2002 ruling on Virtual Child Pornography.
Anonymous8: you could also argue for this like the simpsons kids. the original of this was drawn over 300 yrs ago so that puts the kid in the age range enough to be oogled at the same time your admiring a lil kids schlong so make up your own minds.
tyciol: Here is a copy of the original image on the Wikimedia Commons guys: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_Admiration_(1897).jpg
Anonymous10: In the myths, Eros was as old as many of the first titans, making him technically older than any of the other mainstream greek or roman gods. However, one might question wether or not an actual kid modeled for this? 1700's were not the best time for anyone underage. Or any age, for that matter.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
This is fine. Read the US Supreme Court's 2002 ruling on Virtual Child Pornography.
- Reply
...So, no pedo.
- Reply
- Reply
Plus http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bouguereau for any other art of his.
Why is pedophilia okay when its on little boys, but little girls are a no-no?
@Anonymous: Because you wanted to see it. Your own fault.