Anonymous7(2): I have to say, this is Aardvark's best work yet.
The good: The angle; good posing; Jack's pussy looks great (in comparison to his Ashley model's pussy, which is like a small furry animal in size - I realise that was an experiment); motion is decent (animation looks smoother, only revealing tell for the end of the loop is Sam blinking); lesbian getting the cock (big thumbs up!).
The bad: Sam's weird left arm; Vega's stretchy glute; the person receiving head from Jack is a statue. All in all, pretty minor and easily overlooked.
Would like to see: moar of this! Seriously, this is a great gif. Otherwise, a little more rough/forceful sex (totally understandable if it's not your kink); seeing Sam's tits move would also be a big plus.
Would also like to point out how impressed I am that, while Aardvark watermarks his small images, he leaves his full-scale images (on his tumblr page) unwatermarked. Porn is meant to be enjoyed, and as more and more digital artists ubiquitously watermark their work (somewhat understandable), it ceases to be enjoyable when they do it. Most of the crappy sites that do try to pass off images as their content only do so with the thumbnail-sized images, and it's fantastic that LA lets us enjoy the full-sized images unmarked.
Anonymous12(11): @Anonymous: i was really upset that all the nice girls were straight, so thank god we had just one lesbian for us, wish we had more gays. Welcome to the club.
LordAardvark: Hey all, if you're going to send me any more hatemail over this, please read the following first, before you inevitably make this fallacies and get your whining promptly ignored:
If you're going to make an argument appealing to orientation (which is to say the "you can't make a gay person do straight stuff!") then you damn well have better written me hatemail for every single time I have put a straight person in gay positions, too. Because I'm sorry, Billy, but that fucking argument runs both ways. If you only pick one side of that coin to argue, all that is spewing from your mouth is hypocrisy and horse shit, and I have no reason to listen to a word you have to say.
Someone has been spamming my Tumblr with bitching about this over and over again, constantly repeating themselves with the same pointless drivel that someone makes it 10 lines long, all the while seemingly unaware of the sheer hypocrisy that they are undertaking.
If you're going to argue "putting lesbians in straight positions is wrong!" then you better fucking argue that "putting straight people in lesbian or gay positions is wrong!" too. Elsewise, I have no reason to listen to you.
And one final point: Samantha Traynor is not a person. She does not exist. The Samantha Traynor as portrayed in the Mass Effect series does not exist in real life. She was created by someone. Every trait of her personality, every word she speaks, every polygon that makes up her appearance, were engineered by someone. She is not real. She is imagined. She is a fantastical creation. She is a fantasy.
Fantasies are not governed by any physical or societal laws of the universe. Fantasies only obey the rules that fantasizers apply to them. No more, no less. If it is fantasized that Samantha is lesbian, then she is lesbian. If it is fantasized she is straight, then she is straight. If it is fantasized that she is bisexual, then she is bisexual. If it fantasized that she is a purple tentacle monster from the planet of Xor'bluk disguised as a human to infiltrate our military systems and sabotage our defenses when her people launch a surprise attack against us, then she is that.
No one cares about your moral crusades when you can't even stand by your own high code. If you're going to make that argument and make that hypocritical fallacy, then save your time. I won't bother reading what you have to say.
Anonymous16: @LordAardvark: Sorry, but that's not the smartest excuse. Gay people (or, lesbians in this case) are not in the same position as straight people. There are no myths that you can "turn" straight person gay by gay sex, even if it's forced, while there are such myths about lesbians. "Corrective rape" is huge problem, especially in many parts of Africa, but it happens also in other parts of the world.
Ever heard of real life "corrective rapes" on straight people? No? I thought so.
And last but not least, even in mainstream movies and shows, when there is lesbian character, she's usually "de-gayed" in one way or another. Just look at latest Riddick movie. That's why people get so mad with such depictions and why this excuse ("what about putting straights in gay situations!?") doesn't really work.
Nobody thinks you can turn lesbians straight by fucking them. Some people think lesbians secretly want the D because so many vehemently-lesbian girls end up with a man when they get older, because women are full of shit.
Corrective rape is not a huge problem anywhere, considering homosexuals make up roughly 1% of the population in America according to all the reliable census', and only a fraction of that 1% are ever raped. Lesbians have much more to fear from other lesbians, seeing as how the rate of domestic violence for lesbian couples is markedly higher than for straights. Africa is a generally violent and unsafe place because it's full of sub-85 Negroids, not because someone drew a space lesbindi taking cock.
There's also a huge market for gay on 'straight' porn and straight-acting is considered a huge plus mark on the gay dating scene (not to mention all those little boys being molested by men with 'no sexual preference') so yes, there is a big desire/myth in the homo mind that they can snag themselves a 'breeder'.
overall 1/10 for making me respond, go back to Tumblr and cry yourself to sleep
Anonymous20: @Anonymous16 Ashley is straight, but there is a massive load of porn where she's doing lesbian things. Are you bitching on those pics too?
elflord123: They may have made Ashley straight but originally she was supposed to be a bi-sexual as well but they changed their minds at the last minute. I believe that she should be made a bi-sexual and may be Bioware should make a patch for all platforms for her to be one again.
KalFucker: Yes, Samantha getting raped in every single hole at once! That's the fastest way to break that bitch in, and turn her into a submissive cock addicted fucktoy.
- Reply
- Reply
The good: The angle; good posing; Jack's pussy looks great (in comparison to his Ashley model's pussy, which is like a small furry animal in size - I realise that was an experiment); motion is decent (animation looks smoother, only revealing tell for the end of the loop is Sam blinking); lesbian getting the cock (big thumbs up!).
The bad: Sam's weird left arm; Vega's stretchy glute; the person receiving head from Jack is a statue. All in all, pretty minor and easily overlooked.
Would like to see: moar of this! Seriously, this is a great gif. Otherwise, a little more rough/forceful sex (totally understandable if it's not your kink); seeing Sam's tits move would also be a big plus.
Would also like to point out how impressed I am that, while Aardvark watermarks his small images, he leaves his full-scale images (on his tumblr page) unwatermarked. Porn is meant to be enjoyed, and as more and more digital artists ubiquitously watermark their work (somewhat understandable), it ceases to be enjoyable when they do it. Most of the crappy sites that do try to pass off images as their content only do so with the thumbnail-sized images, and it's fantastic that LA lets us enjoy the full-sized images unmarked.
- Reply
Its no surprise that Traynor would feel the same way.
- Reply
- Reply
If you're going to make an argument appealing to orientation (which is to say the "you can't make a gay person do straight stuff!") then you damn well have better written me hatemail for every single time I have put a straight person in gay positions, too. Because I'm sorry, Billy, but that fucking argument runs both ways. If you only pick one side of that coin to argue, all that is spewing from your mouth is hypocrisy and horse shit, and I have no reason to listen to a word you have to say.
Someone has been spamming my Tumblr with bitching about this over and over again, constantly repeating themselves with the same pointless drivel that someone makes it 10 lines long, all the while seemingly unaware of the sheer hypocrisy that they are undertaking.
If you're going to argue "putting lesbians in straight positions is wrong!" then you better fucking argue that "putting straight people in lesbian or gay positions is wrong!" too. Elsewise, I have no reason to listen to you.
And one final point: Samantha Traynor is not a person. She does not exist. The Samantha Traynor as portrayed in the Mass Effect series does not exist in real life. She was created by someone. Every trait of her personality, every word she speaks, every polygon that makes up her appearance, were engineered by someone. She is not real. She is imagined. She is a fantastical creation. She is a fantasy.
Fantasies are not governed by any physical or societal laws of the universe. Fantasies only obey the rules that fantasizers apply to them. No more, no less. If it is fantasized that Samantha is lesbian, then she is lesbian. If it is fantasized she is straight, then she is straight. If it is fantasized that she is bisexual, then she is bisexual. If it fantasized that she is a purple tentacle monster from the planet of Xor'bluk disguised as a human to infiltrate our military systems and sabotage our defenses when her people launch a surprise attack against us, then she is that.
No one cares about your moral crusades when you can't even stand by your own high code. If you're going to make that argument and make that hypocritical fallacy, then save your time. I won't bother reading what you have to say.
Thank you.
- Reply
Ever heard of real life "corrective rapes" on straight people? No? I thought so.
And last but not least, even in mainstream movies and shows, when there is lesbian character, she's usually "de-gayed" in one way or another. Just look at latest Riddick movie. That's why people get so mad with such depictions and why this excuse ("what about putting straights in gay situations!?") doesn't really work.
Nobody thinks you can turn lesbians straight by fucking them. Some people think lesbians secretly want the D because so many vehemently-lesbian girls end up with a man when they get older, because women are full of shit.
Corrective rape is not a huge problem anywhere, considering homosexuals make up roughly 1% of the population in America according to all the reliable census', and only a fraction of that 1% are ever raped. Lesbians have much more to fear from other lesbians, seeing as how the rate of domestic violence for lesbian couples is markedly higher than for straights. Africa is a generally violent and unsafe place because it's full of sub-85 Negroids, not because someone drew a space lesbindi taking cock.
There's also a huge market for gay on 'straight' porn and straight-acting is considered a huge plus mark on the gay dating scene (not to mention all those little boys being molested by men with 'no sexual preference') so yes, there is a big desire/myth in the homo mind that they can snag themselves a 'breeder'.
overall 1/10 for making me respond, go back to Tumblr and cry yourself to sleep
- Reply