Anonymous5: @Anonymous: He's not critiquing the art, that's someone insulting the artist because she didn't add a very obscure detail on the character because she didn't read the books. There's nothing about the actual quality of the art, nor anything constructive about it.
Anonymous6(5): @Anonymous: Im not assuming he's an artist, I'm pointing out the fact that if he tried to come close to doing the same quality of art, that would be a "fail". He's not critiquing the art, that's someone insulting the artist because she didn't add a very obscure detail on the character because she didn't read the books. There's nothing about the actual quality of the art, nor anything constructive about it.
- Reply