Urbane_Guerrilla: @hakepeter: You don't much *like* sex, do you? This is as immature sexually as it is artistically.
Spend the next ten or fifteen years... well. *Then,* having lived some and having bought a tablet and learned a good drafting program, try your hand again at porno.
WaterDrinker9000: @Urbane_Guerrilla: Damn attractive and successful African, this image is hotter than the sun. I don't know what the fuck your problem is.
Urbane_Guerrilla: I guess your paint's still wet then, Stencil. This isn't hot at all, being decades too immature to qualify as hot. That is the problem; it won't do as art or as erotica. Don't be a troll. And if you have no taste, don't be a commenter either.
WaterDrinker9000: @Urbane_Guerrilla: Damn. You seem like a massive faggot who can't take a joke. Why complain about shit that isn't trying to be good, when there're plenty of other images that are just plain bad. Like this : >>1797887 Seriously. If you want consistent quality, then why are you even on Paheal?
Urbane_Guerrilla: @Stencil: Pretty false god, then. Low-quality gods got no business anywhere above or below. Same goes for Teh Unfunny; the quality is too low to be amusing, and hewing to it trying to deny criticism simply demonstrates for all the Internetz an inferiority of mind so massive and condensed it has an event horizon.
Urbane_Guerrilla: Criticism, that is, that is more honest than your "artistic" effort. You have to get real to run with this pack. Consider Oni/Catthouse here onsite if you seek an example of the good stuff. Then take a good look at this. Can it compare? It cannot.
- Reply
Spend the next ten or fifteen years... well. *Then,* having lived some and having bought a tablet and learned a good drafting program, try your hand again at porno.
- Reply
>The joke
>Your head
- Reply
- Reply
Seriously. If you want consistent quality, then why are you even on Paheal?
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
are you 12 or just autistic?