Franky_Whiskey: So this lemon is hitting theaters on July 15th, 2016. What do?
I saw the trailers, definetly no me gusta. I saw the trailers again trying this time to trick myself into the mindset of a staunch SJW. No dice as well. To me the movie just falls flat- like stale days-old beer flat.
So what predictions are we casting for this flop?:\>
Anonymous1: Yeah, it looks reaaaaaaaaally bad. I don't know how good it is, but from what I've seen (and heard, seriously? Fall Out Boy for the remix? How does that fit at all?) I'll pass thank you.
AnonV3: How the fuck are they going to even do Venkman as a chick? His whole shtick is being a creepy, dirty sex-a-holic. It's a stupid gimmick for a crappy 80's nostalgia flick. Seriously thinking it's going to bomb badly.
Anonymous6: The trailers and promotion has been absolutely disgusting. It looks like a terrible film made by terrible people for terrible reasons. If you agree, don't go see it. Not even if you want to see a train wreck, don't support that.
Franky_Whiskey: @Anonymous: It *hasn't come out yet, at least in the U.S., my dear tumblrtard. But if the trailers are any indication, shit is going to fail epically.
I mean, if anything movies have is that the trailers are always far better than the whole movie itself, that's understandable since their objective is to convince the audience to see it. If the trailers themselves fail, then we have a problem, since that is a guaranteed sign the movie is just as bad or worse. Unless your name is Quentin Taran-fucking-tino, a shit trailer means even shittier movie.
But one has to give it to the media to put the last nail on this cumstained coffin, with their whole sexist man-blaming angle and "bashing"(now this is the correct definition of that, unlike yours) on the only demographic willing to pour out their shekels to watch a mediocre 90-minute skit based verbatim on an average movie of the 80's. Pretty rich how they pander to the demographic that least understands concepts such as "money" and "buying", who have in turn, as per their nature, attacked the movie for not being progressive enough, lolz.
But of course, feel free to call us fucking idiots. When friday is over, we'll see how much of a disaster said half-baked Rule63 spoof actually was.
traffik: I like all of the main cast, but my hopes aren't that high. I like Melissa McCarthy a lot, but she doesn't do many good movies. I like Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon, but I haven't seen a single shred of evidence thus far that either of them are funny in this movie. It kind of looks like Leslie Jones steals the show, which doesn't surprise me. She's consistently been a highlight of SNL the last couple of years. Still, there's only so much you can do with a horrible script, and I fear that that's going to be the case here.
ChaosInuYasha: Yeah I saw some reviews and it does reek of SJW Manbusting the movie, I mean when you take down the main villain by shooting him where his dick is and potray every male as bumbling, incompetent, assholes and other extremes it'll send a bad message, also I watched the trailers and the comedy was weak. I'm not against a ghostbusting team of females, hell I LOVED Kylie Griffin back in the Extreme Ghostbusters cartoon but if your acting is shit and you're pushing an agenda your movie's gonna tank HARD
Tumor: @Anonymous: Do you know what the term "bomb" means? Because if you did, I don't believe you'd be posting critical reception like that will be a definitive impact on whether or not it WILL bomb.
Alopex: @ChaosInuYasha: Unless you live in a world where many reviewers are too scared of SJW/Feminazi backlash to give genuine criticism of this shit pile of a movie... which we do.
Seriously, so many reviews read in the most spineless, contradictory way, with criticisms tentatively brought up but then covered with a recommendation as to not offend the crazies who are championing the film.
Franky_Whiskey: @Anonymous: Like@Alopex said, Im not going to trust critics that sound like they're judging tampon commercials:
"A goofy, free-floating romp with an anarchic spirit of its own, a fresh set of scares and laffs and a moderate dose of girl power that is unlikely to seem confrontational to anyone beyond the most confirmed basement-dwelling Gamergate troll." ~Andrew "I have no idea what Gaymergate is" Ohehir
"(...)Director Paul Feig, who’s got a knack for big-budget Hollywood silliness (“Spy,” “The Heat,” “Bridesmaids”), finds a light, breezy tone early on"~Moira "The Breeze" Mcdonald
"It feels a little like this "Ghostbusters" was a cultural test that we (not the movie) have already failed. Feig's film may be a feminist milestone: a big ol' popcorn movie taken over by women (something that should have happened long ago and engendered far less vitriol). But it's also simply a breezy good time, one that just happens to culminate with four very funny ladies shooting a monster in the balls.~Jake "shoot testicles for a good time" Coyle
"(...)Remaking this beloved film with women as leads is an act revolutionary enough to attract the ire of legions of Ghostbros insisting that the very concept will warp time and space to retroactively ruin their childhoods.(...) The toxic pre-lash to this Ghostbusters has seeped into the plot, and especially into Rowan, an aggrieved internet-troll type who wants to “cleanse” the world as revenge for perceived mistreatment(...) The interesting part is in how these characters bounce off of one another along the way, these brilliant, awkward, hilarious women who come to find they need affirmation only from one another. It's a sight that’s worth all the nasty comment sections the internet has to offer." ~ Alison "Teh Buzzwordz" Willmore
Farfegnugen: I don't think Paul Feig made a movie I gave the smallest shit about. Spy, The Heat, Bridesmaid, oh yeah, I heard nothing but the greatest things about those from really boring of people. Melissa McCarthy was in great films like... IMDB help. ... Nope nothing. She was in a bunch of Paul's movies. They fucking?
I still might go to see if it worth the 75% on RottenTomato.
CoolDudeKylePeters: The movie looks like complete shit. I didn't like the original ghost busters that much though so throwing in gender bending, slap stick, retarded girl power bs, forced cameos, and the fact that this is a huge cash grab that all the SJW retards will pay to see and praise it even if it's shit means that I'll hate it even more. Also nothing against the actors they're actually good. Also u hats the fact they called everyone who hated the trailer sexist and ended up getting publicity by cherry picking all the sexist and racist comments that were over the top. If they're so desperate to get attention for the movie then it's probably pretty bad.
SPLA_T00N: " four very funny ladies shooting a monster in the balls.~Jake "shoot testicles for a good time" Coyle "
END MY LIFE AT THIS VERY MOMENT PLEASE!
I WANT TO DIE RIGHT NOW!
HOW DID HUMANITY REACH THIS POINT!?
Anonymous14(12): @Anonymous: 4 rich white male aristocrats hire a deprived black woman as a secretary to entertain themselves with her weird language and terrible manners. Then they deign to do everyone a favour and save the day. Then they bill the city, forcing them to sharply cut social services and make everybody miserable (or, if we want the movie to be children-friendly: they realise the sheer meaninglessness of their riches and contribute them for everyone).
Now that would be AGENDA the movie. I feel triggered even typing this.
FurryFun: At first, I thought it was a "lets make a ghostbusters that kicks people that remember the original ones in the crotches, while masturbating feminist egos" type of thing, but unlike the rest of you yahoos, I've done my research.
Turns out, I was wrong. They cast all females, because what the hell, why not? I mean sure, mixing male characters as ghostbusters in with female ones would have been much better and had a bajillion more plot capabilities, but fuck it. they've got ghostbusting gear that's based on actual science (seriously, google it), they've got far better ghosts than the original stuff did, although I don't like the pink fade on the ghostmobile, at least the yellow flashers on it make it goddamn more realistic (seriously, blue is meant for law enforcement).
And besides, go watch the original ghostbusters movies. I think you're over-romanticizing it in your heads a bit due to nostalgia. They didn't exactly set the bar that high, so lets just stop bashing on this until we've actually seen the movie itself, shall we?
I don't know what previews you people have been watching, but the ones I've seen are fucking hilarious.
Whatwatwat: KEK, I didn't know this site had so many white boy cucks and SJW faggs, the movie is shit, the idea behind it is shit, it's not the actresses fault it's the people who wrote this SJW Feminazi tumblerina shit that's at fault. Ya'll white cucks can go tuck your dicks between your legs while you and your bull dyke gf go watch it.
Anonymous18: Can you all shut the FUCK up and stop calling it shit when you've only seen a few 2 minute trailers and alot of critics are giving it good reviews anyway I for one am very excited for this movie and i think it looks WAY BETTER than the original one. And dont even fucking say anything about being paid off by sony you dicks. Also FurryFun thanks for being a mature human being
Anonymous19(18): Also people who are saying this is sexist towards men its literally just genderswapped from the first one, anyone who watches Adventure Time should get this and noone ever complans about their genderswapped episodes. This whole Ghostbusters controversy has really made me loose my hope in humanity
Anonymous23: Here's how the movie was conceived:
"Let's take a movie from long ago that a lot of people loved and spit in the fans' faces then kick them in the side of the head!"
Anonymous25: @Anonymous: I saw it early. It sucks. It absolutely is just a man-hating uninspired pandering mess. Humor is subjective so my opinion obviously won't represent everybody's but in my undecidedly learned opinion it isn't worth watching for anybody except the lowest common denominator of bandwagon progressives. Ghostbusters 2016 is a blatant attempt to cash in on gender politics, it's the equivalent of cinematic clickbait. This is a movie for people who haven't had an original thought since they developed object permanence. A photograph of Young Thug in women's clothing is already more notable than this movie will ever be.
Anonymous26: I'm betting on the Porn parody for this crap movie will actually have more viewers and a better plot and acting than the movie it's lampooning.
There's been a couple of youtube reviews, the 'best' review was basically:
It's meh. They left out a lot of stuff in the trailers, the villains motivation wasn't really stated, they kind of just rushed to the 'climatic' battle scene and then had 30 more minutes of the movie. The movie wasn't as bad of the trailers but it seemed like they wanted to hurry up and get to the end at the start.
And several reviewers said they had to watch twice as they fell asleep.
Then again, to be fair, they made way the hell better and more accurate trailers way back then. (mainly due to the producers actually fucking GIVING THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF MAKING TRAILERS an advance copy of the movie, to see what they can do with it. they don't do that anymore.)
But nonetheless, you're right. The old one does have a way the hell better official trailer.
Anonymous29(10): you would have to be at least 44 years old (in most of the world) to even remember the original. dont you have grandkids to care about instead of this shit?
Farfegnugen: @Anonymous: I'm in my 30s and I've seen the Ghostbusters as a kid. Hell, that was my first movie I remember. Funny thing, it was also my first double feature, because we went to see Star Trek 3 right after but fell asleep during it.
Farfegnugen: The reviews are coming in and it's mostly been, "Meh, it's okay. Not worth the $15, but a $1 Redbox." Already sound better than most of Feig's other movies.
Anonymous30: Ha ha ha! Look at all you fucking bitches. Wow. You know what, life must be really fucking interesting to someone who gets so worked up over a movie. I picture it something like you wake up every day and everything must seem new and terrifying for the first few minutes. What must you be like in a situation where something that's actually threatening happens? Useless as soggy, I bet.
Girls in a movie. Grow some hair on your balls and get the fuck over it, you lilly-lovin' daisies.
awesomesause175: @Anonymous: "life must be really fucking interesting to someone who gets so worked up over a movie" says someone complaining that people think a movie's bad because it uses a narrative to get sjws to buy it and telling normal people their bad. know im not an expert in the area but if you tell half of you potential audience that their inferior because of their gender the movie might not be well recieved to most people
deathstriker: @Franky_Whiskey: You are right, you are absolutely right. This movie is going to be cancer for every man still having a pair of balls between his thighs, however, I REALLY, REALLY think that this kind of methodology should be continued and embraced.
Making SJW-infested movies of cult classic ones, that is. So, they will bomb, hard, and major movie studios are going to close because of that. Think about it, if the movie industry crashes you seriously dispatch a plethora of SJW-ism alongside it.
Anonymous36: Fact: Nothing about this movie can possibly be worse than Ghostbusters 2. I don't know why people are acting like this is what's destroying a rich franchise known for its otherwise excellent sequels.
Gackt: @Anonymous: GB2 wasn't that bad granted a lot of sequels are, but a medieval Carpathian douchebag was good for a movie of that generation. You want to talk about bad movies DragonBall Evolution that was horrible (I still think r34 made that movie because it ruined my childhood). This a current Ghostbusters and GB2 are about neck and neck.
Kyosei: @Anonymous: Ghostbusters 2 was at least in the same universe. This movie just say "All other Ghostbusters movies aren't canon anymore! This is the new canon!"
So, no! It's worse than Ghostbusters 2
Farfegnugen: @Kyosei: You know what have made this movie slightly better, keeping in the same universe. The original four could have started to open up a chain of Ghostbusters offices all over the country, the world, and these four could have been one of the branch Ghostbusters in L.A., Chicago, or Baton Rouge. Hell, the original could show up to help launch the new office. That way the movie would stay in continuity with the rest of the movies, even had a chance for some of the originals to strap on a Proton Pack.
The writer, surprise, Paul Feig, didn't think of that one. I swear, he's better actor that director and writer.
Okay, so, I know you can't tell just by reading text if I'm being ironic, or sarcastic, or trolling, or some other thing. I want you to know in ADVANCE that I'm telling you right now, swear to Summers, that I'm not. I'm being legit straight with you.
BETTER THAN DEADPOOL.
I am going to see this fucking movie, again, later this weekend. Don't believe any of the bullshit you heard from people who haven't seen it. There was *ONE* dumb joke (a fart joke) near the very beginning of the movie that made me worry. The rest of the movie was God Damn Fucking GOLD.
There was no "constant man bashing." And everybody did an AMAZING job. Again, not going to spoil anything. But, the only thing you need to understand going into it is that these women might resemble the original Ghostbusters, but they are not, I repeat *NOT* female versions of them in any way. Holtzzman looks like Egon from TAS, but she's NOTHING like Egon. None of these women are parodying the Ghostbusters from the 1980s. I am so fucking delighted to be wrong about how this movie turned out. It's really good. Honestly. And I WILL go see it again. Maybe twice. And I hope to hell the word gets out, because I already want to see the sequel.
Farfegnugen: It was okay like most people are saying out there. Minor spoilers, nothing that will ruin anything.
Better than Deadpool, depends on the mind set. You are comparing dark humor versus very dark humor. If you knew anything about his character, you already knew the movie was going dick, fart, and dead bodies jokes. I've heard that quiff joke was the joke, but it wasn't. The first real joke was the haunted house/museum tour guide making fun of the Irish. That stupid quiff joke came in later. Anon27 was right in some area, overboard in some.
Melissa McCarthy was not funny, at all. However, Kate McKinnon was really great. Something got counter balance McCarthy. Leslie Jones's Patty I thought was going to be a typical black woman. She was, but she had her moments. Chris Hemsworth, even though he was playing slow-witted actor/model, was pretty funny. Kristin Wiig was in this. I thought it was going a giant "GIRL POWER!" movie, but it didn't have that feel to it.
When the pointed out something from the first movie, it wasn't a little wink, it was spotlight right in the eyes. Stay-Puff was changed from a giant marshmallow to a Macy's Day Parade balloon. Ghost CG was okay, but shame puppets weren't used for some. Some jokes were great, some were a giant thud. Unlike the original where there so many quotable lines, none in this one. Not a one.
If I was to score it: 6, just rent it at RedBox or whatever.
Farfegnugen: @Anonymous: Kristin Wiig chased after Hemsworth's ass the whole fucking movie. That might have been really funny if 40 year-old single lady, but she was like the literally every time she was in the same room as him. To the actual question, no.
analman: Laughing at Men doing Typical Men's stuff = Humor
Laughing at Women doing Typical Women's stuff = Misogyny!
Laughing at Women doing Typical Men's stuff(in this movie) = Cringeworthy at best
Anonymous38: IT'S A FUCKING ADAM SANDLER MOVIE WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF EVEN HAVING ADAM SANDLER IN IT!
Set your bar low and you'll be amused. I'm talking low. REAL low. You think it's low enough? Can you limbo under it? It's not low enough. Can Barbados Slim limbo under it? It's not low enough. The only person that should limbo under this bar is Hermes Conrad.
Anonymous41: So many guys being petty over the dumbest shit. It's an all female cast, big fucking deal. Do you know how many films there are with dudes as main characters? You just don't notice it 'cause its been the default since god knows when. It's a re-make, so nobody should go into it expecting the greatness of the original. The world no longer totally revolves around straight white men anymore. Grow the fuck up.
Anonymous42: So many people are angry because they say in his movie the men are shown as idiots and is sexist towards men, but they seem to have forgotten the hundreds of movies that are showing women as useless as well. If men can have their own movies that are sexist toward women they shouldn't cry about it when a movie is sexist towards men.
Anonymous43(41): @Anonymous: They'll cry because they're a bunch of entitled babies. Men who get angry over this shit seem incapable of putting themselves in anyone else's shoes; especially if its a woman's. All this complaining is like the gendered version of "white people problems"..
IM_IIHTARW: @Anonymous: You got that backwards. If women can be upset over movies that are disparaging to their gender, likewise men can get upset over the same. besides I'd wager more people, both men and women, are upset because the movie barely bothers to hide the fact that it's a cash grab, bastardizing a cult classic by using hot button issues that will hopelessly date the movie, just to put butts is seats for the first couple of weeks after its premier.
IM_IIHTARW: Movies that have nods to pop culture phenomenon can still be timeless, Movies that try to be part of a pop culture phenomenon are forgotten in a year of two.
TheDinkleyBoy: Keyblademaster it's a movie with a 140 mill shooting budget and only made 60 million world wide on opening weekend.....and most movies drop 40+% a week unless they're that damn good.... This isn't that damn good
Farfegnugen: @Anonymous: Much rather they get someone else to do the Ghostbusters movies than Sony folding their arms and saying, "Well, people just don't want Ghostbuster movies."
@TheDinkleyBoy: They'll make up the differance overseas and DVD/BluRay sells.
Farfegnugen: Any which way about it, Ghostbusters 2 is happening. Hey Sony, dump Pual Feig. Keep the ladies because you can do something with three of them.
What about women who are angry "over this shit"? Oh wait, the official Tumblr stance is that "they're fucking idiots", is it not? Real progressive, ese jay warriah.
TheDinkleyBoy: 62 million world wide opening weekend with a production budget of 144 + who knows how much in marketing (at least 100 mill between all the merchandise, advertising and special screenings)
mrbutt2: three unfunny women and what appears to be Harambe's mate do battle against goasts and movie viewers' choice (the viewers are winning, this turd is bombing)
watching the retards who greenlit this take a bath as it gets financially curbstomped is glorious.
Franky_Whiskey: @Anonymous: I don't even feel happy it bombed, since that means we'll probably never get a decent remake of the original made. Fact is Hollywuss might just chalk up all plans to remake classics because "nerd rage", while Paul Figged keeps making femibullcrap movies like nothing bad happened.
Then again, maybe it's for the best. We'll no longer have to endure seeing good movies butchered by the PC police.
Anonymous59: Yes like the ff4 sequel and likewise the amazing Spider-Man 3. It is a spin just bluffing that they are still positive and alright. 2nd week star trek and ice age is coming. Let's see if this film has legs to survive.
Anonymous60(38): They said there would be a sequel before the weekend numbers were even in. There won't be a sequel and Paul Feig's career is going to be torpedoed because of the piece of shit he made.
Kinta: I was honestly half-expecting this to have been replaced by something like Milo Yiannopolis (or however the fuck you spell it) getting sucked off by the Prophet Muhammad when I first came here.
Anonymous63: I just watched this piece of shit remake on a stream - don't let the critics fool you, it's the worst movie of 2016 by a country mile.
Thankfully, the legs on this movie look to be pretty bad compared to Paul Feig's other movies, and the international crowd doesn't seem to care much for it, so it's going to bomb.
Fuck Amy Pascal for not letting Ivan Reitman make the third movie that everyone wanted in favor of some unfunny, half-assed political statement.
Anonymous64: Anon 63 shut the actual fuck up, the was the funniset movie i've ever seen the jokes were clever the cgi was amazing the characters were great and it was about 50 times better than the original wich is a very boring movie compared to this one.All of you haters are just sexist babies that have no sense of humor and cant accept that this movie is better then the one from your "pwecious childhood" these women are the funniest human beings i have ever seen and i watch ALOT of comedy. You all need to realize your are being extremly immature and you have to stop hating on things that you refuse to accept are good because "its different" or " its starring women" so please try ( emphasis on try) to be a respectable human being and let people enjoy what they want to enjoy. And please try to realize that sexism and racism are wrong and it hurts alot of people so please just leave this movie alone because there were happy people in that theater with me and thats what movies are all about.
Anonymous70: lol, I love how this movie is being criticized as "man hating" when this comment section is full of assholes calling women "fat" and "feminist bitches". You people obviously never get out of the house, just stay on your computer all day, and jerk off to porn.
No wonder women don't respect people like you guys.
Anonymous73: You guys are all misguided. Quricky teenage girls love it and moviegoers despise it. However , this is not the only movie that has shown cinematography had bent over to mindless propaganda to meet the demands of the people.Itbis supposed to be the other way around. If all of us stop people pleasing there will be more creative content and less "I'm right you're wrong". These kinds of movies are designed to break society apart.
- Reply
I saw the trailers, definetly no me gusta. I saw the trailers again trying this time to trick myself into the mindset of a staunch SJW. No dice as well. To me the movie just falls flat- like stale days-old beer flat.
So what predictions are we casting for this flop?:\>
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I mean, if anything movies have is that the trailers are always far better than the whole movie itself, that's understandable since their objective is to convince the audience to see it. If the trailers themselves fail, then we have a problem, since that is a guaranteed sign the movie is just as bad or worse. Unless your name is Quentin Taran-fucking-tino, a shit trailer means even shittier movie.
But one has to give it to the media to put the last nail on this cumstained coffin, with their whole sexist man-blaming angle and "bashing"(now this is the correct definition of that, unlike yours) on the only demographic willing to pour out their shekels to watch a mediocre 90-minute skit based verbatim on an average movie of the 80's. Pretty rich how they pander to the demographic that least understands concepts such as "money" and "buying", who have in turn, as per their nature, attacked the movie for not being progressive enough, lolz.
But of course, feel free to call us fucking idiots. When friday is over, we'll see how much of a disaster said half-baked Rule63 spoof actually was.
- Reply
And people have seen advance screenings.
It's bad. Very bad.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Seriously, so many reviews read in the most spineless, contradictory way, with criticisms tentatively brought up but then covered with a recommendation as to not offend the crazies who are championing the film.
- Reply
Yeah, sounds totally legit! Totally.
- Reply
I still might go to see if it worth the 75% on RottenTomato.
- Reply
END MY LIFE AT THIS VERY MOMENT PLEASE!
I WANT TO DIE RIGHT NOW!
HOW DID HUMANITY REACH THIS POINT!?
- Reply
2. Add 1 female character
3. Add an asian character
4. Have them all go to hell
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Now that would be AGENDA the movie. I feel triggered even typing this.
- Reply
Turns out, I was wrong. They cast all females, because what the hell, why not? I mean sure, mixing male characters as ghostbusters in with female ones would have been much better and had a bajillion more plot capabilities, but fuck it. they've got ghostbusting gear that's based on actual science (seriously, google it), they've got far better ghosts than the original stuff did, although I don't like the pink fade on the ghostmobile, at least the yellow flashers on it make it goddamn more realistic (seriously, blue is meant for law enforcement).
And besides, go watch the original ghostbusters movies. I think you're over-romanticizing it in your heads a bit due to nostalgia. They didn't exactly set the bar that high, so lets just stop bashing on this until we've actually seen the movie itself, shall we?
I don't know what previews you people have been watching, but the ones I've seen are fucking hilarious.
- Reply
Both are trailers. Yet only one makes me want to go and shell out 15 buckaroos to see it on the big screen.
- Reply
- Reply
0/10
- Reply
11/10
- Reply
Hey look, it's Cuck and Cucker, lel.
"Let's take a movie from long ago that a lot of people loved and spit in the fans' faces then kick them in the side of the head!"
- Reply
- Reply
There's been a couple of youtube reviews, the 'best' review was basically:
It's meh. They left out a lot of stuff in the trailers, the villains motivation wasn't really stated, they kind of just rushed to the 'climatic' battle scene and then had 30 more minutes of the movie. The movie wasn't as bad of the trailers but it seemed like they wanted to hurry up and get to the end at the start.
And several reviewers said they had to watch twice as they fell asleep.
- Reply
Then again, to be fair, they made way the hell better and more accurate trailers way back then. (mainly due to the producers actually fucking GIVING THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF MAKING TRAILERS an advance copy of the movie, to see what they can do with it. they don't do that anymore.)
But nonetheless, you're right. The old one does have a way the hell better official trailer.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
But they already made the movie! Now you're just going in a circle!
Girls in a movie. Grow some hair on your balls and get the fuck over it, you lilly-lovin' daisies.
- Reply
Seriously, attractive and successful African, that shit don't work here. Shove that Tumblr rethoric up your ass.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Making SJW-infested movies of cult classic ones, that is. So, they will bomb, hard, and major movie studios are going to close because of that. Think about it, if the movie industry crashes you seriously dispatch a plethora of SJW-ism alongside it.
- Reply
1st joke is a quiff joke.
Neon Neon everywhere.
All Characters are stereotypes.
ALL males are certifiably retarded.
The bad guy's motive....he got picked on. Oped
Male insults everywhere, nut shots constantly.
All quotes are from other movies.
All mains are oped as people drop like flies.
Cameos..........shouldn't of been in at all. The male originals are all assholes.
Again the males are certifiably retarded the secretary can't even answer a god damn phone without one of the mains telling him how.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
So, no! It's worse than Ghostbusters 2
- Reply
- Reply
The writer, surprise, Paul Feig, didn't think of that one. I swear, he's better actor that director and writer.
- Reply
Okay, so, I know you can't tell just by reading text if I'm being ironic, or sarcastic, or trolling, or some other thing. I want you to know in ADVANCE that I'm telling you right now, swear to Summers, that I'm not. I'm being legit straight with you.
BETTER THAN DEADPOOL.
I am going to see this fucking movie, again, later this weekend. Don't believe any of the bullshit you heard from people who haven't seen it. There was *ONE* dumb joke (a fart joke) near the very beginning of the movie that made me worry. The rest of the movie was God Damn Fucking GOLD.
There was no "constant man bashing." And everybody did an AMAZING job. Again, not going to spoil anything. But, the only thing you need to understand going into it is that these women might resemble the original Ghostbusters, but they are not, I repeat *NOT* female versions of them in any way. Holtzzman looks like Egon from TAS, but she's NOTHING like Egon. None of these women are parodying the Ghostbusters from the 1980s. I am so fucking delighted to be wrong about how this movie turned out. It's really good. Honestly. And I WILL go see it again. Maybe twice. And I hope to hell the word gets out, because I already want to see the sequel.
'MURICA !
- Reply
Better than Deadpool, depends on the mind set. You are comparing dark humor versus very dark humor. If you knew anything about his character, you already knew the movie was going dick, fart, and dead bodies jokes. I've heard that quiff joke was the joke, but it wasn't. The first real joke was the haunted house/museum tour guide making fun of the Irish. That stupid quiff joke came in later. Anon27 was right in some area, overboard in some.
Melissa McCarthy was not funny, at all. However, Kate McKinnon was really great. Something got counter balance McCarthy. Leslie Jones's Patty I thought was going to be a typical black woman. She was, but she had her moments. Chris Hemsworth, even though he was playing slow-witted actor/model, was pretty funny. Kristin Wiig was in this. I thought it was going a giant "GIRL POWER!" movie, but it didn't have that feel to it.
When the pointed out something from the first movie, it wasn't a little wink, it was spotlight right in the eyes. Stay-Puff was changed from a giant marshmallow to a Macy's Day Parade balloon. Ghost CG was okay, but shame puppets weren't used for some. Some jokes were great, some were a giant thud. Unlike the original where there so many quotable lines, none in this one. Not a one.
If I was to score it: 6, just rent it at RedBox or whatever.
- Reply
Laughing at Women doing Typical Women's stuff = Misogyny!
Laughing at Women doing Typical Men's stuff(in this movie) = Cringeworthy at best
That is why nobody laughs, except women.
Set your bar low and you'll be amused. I'm talking low. REAL low. You think it's low enough? Can you limbo under it? It's not low enough. Can Barbados Slim limbo under it? It's not low enough. The only person that should limbo under this bar is Hermes Conrad.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
@TheDinkleyBoy: They'll make up the differance overseas and DVD/BluRay sells.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
What about women who are angry "over this shit"? Oh wait, the official Tumblr stance is that "they're fucking idiots", is it not? Real progressive, ese jay warriah.
- Reply
- Reply
watching the retards who greenlit this take a bath as it gets financially curbstomped is glorious.
THANKS FUCKING GOD!
Do I really want Paul Fagg and Melissa McChunky to continue to make movies?
Remember, answers considered politically incorrect will be penalized.
- Reply
Then again, maybe it's for the best. We'll no longer have to endure seeing good movies butchered by the PC police.
Think again:
http://www.thewrap.com/ghostbusters-sequel-will-happen-sony/
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
A furfag defending this piece of shit. Why am I not surprised?
YIFF IN HELL YOU PIECE OF SJW SHIT
Thankfully, the legs on this movie look to be pretty bad compared to Paul Feig's other movies, and the international crowd doesn't seem to care much for it, so it's going to bomb.
Fuck Amy Pascal for not letting Ivan Reitman make the third movie that everyone wanted in favor of some unfunny, half-assed political statement.
- Reply
No wonder women don't respect people like you guys.
Well, we are not wrong on this one.
- Reply