Farfegnugen: @O Rly: "Set by Zvantastika" Besides, don't we normally tag everything in the image, like Sonic, Pikachu, whatever that dopey Muppet that is.
O_Rly: Like if they're inanimate objects that aren't meant to be the focus of the picture, I'd say no, definitely not. Characters who are actually toys/background images are more of a grey area but I'd still say no. Because, again, we're not a Booru site. But hey watch me be wrong on something this yet again. g ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Farfegnugen: @O Rly: Do you just tag characters if they are only involved in the porn part of the image, and not just there? I'm just asking, going by what you are saying, because there are literal tens of thousands of images that need to be fixed. Let's take something like a Simpsons image where Homer and Marge are fucking and Bart and Milhouse are watching. Do you just tag Homer and Marge, or all the characters in the image?
Honestly, I won't have tagged the Skittles, eggs, or Legos, but then again, I won't have changed tag back if someone added them.
RogerTheRabbit: @Farfegnugen: @Farfegnugen:
In that case, Bart and Milhouse would be part of the image, not inanimate objects like toys. Now if those toys came to life as anthropomorphic characters and gangraped her, then yes, tag away.
Farfegnugen: @RogerTheRabbit: But these dolls are a part of the image as well. Set dressing or no, they are there. Are you saying she got to fuck one in order for it tagged? I can see where O Rly going because we'll end up tagging stuff like the candy, eggs, markers, and blankets, so it could be hard to tell where the line is when tagging stuff.
Not like this is covered in the Tagging Guide or rules, but cause this stuff is new to me. Never been an issue until yesterday.
Anonymous11: @Anonymous: as some others have said it became a meme to call Sara Ryder autistic or mentally challenged because of the crappy facial animations the game was released with. Some of them have since been patched, but the reputation was never gonna be salvaged. The gifs and memes pretty much came to define Andromeda's reputation from day one.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Honestly, I won't have tagged the Skittles, eggs, or Legos, but then again, I won't have changed tag back if someone added them.
In that case, Bart and Milhouse would be part of the image, not inanimate objects like toys. Now if those toys came to life as anthropomorphic characters and gangraped her, then yes, tag away.
- Reply
Not like this is covered in the Tagging Guide or rules, but cause this stuff is new to me. Never been an issue until yesterday.
- Reply
- Reply
What the hell is wrong with Sarah Ryder? Is this "cryogenics-gone-wrong" where she's permanently a brain-damaged dumb fuck forever?
I actually hope so, so we can fuck her around good.