TheTilt2805: Those "preteens" don't even exist you absolut moron. they are fictional fucking characters so how about you get your head out of your ass and fuck off.
Anonymous4: Can't justify pedophilla just by saying they don't exist, it's still an image of a minor(s) in a sexual situation. It's still morally wrong.
Anonymous7: I agree, always have and always will that people should have the right to draw whatever the fuck they want. Honestly I just kinda find it a little weird and amusing that ya take a dating game filled with hot guys to fuck around with (and like, Mary and Amanda who are both "legal" and hot) aaand ya choose to draw the porn of the little asian twins. XD Personally I don't get it, but it is just a drawing, guys. And the art is pretty damn good.
Anonymous8: @Anonymous: By that logic, you being a screaming faggot online is just as bad as you being an actual homosexual in real life, according to Christianity. You're going to Hell, bud.
Anonymous9: Pft, yeah. Its true man. I'm sorry, but you bitches on your moral highgrounds will never be able to convince me that drawing somehow = morally/criminally wrong. Truly, the only way that feels possible is if it were a tool used to commit an actual crime, say, pedo uses somethin like this to normalize it so kid thinks its ok to get raped, that whole arguement. Well. At best, all the drawing is is 'evidence' to support showing the criminals mental depravity. Same as murderer playing too many violent video games. Video games arent the issue, same as art like this is not the issue. People can be into depraved things without being messed up themselves. Stop taking everything so seriously, its just a freakin cartoon.
Anonymous13: @anon 11 f 12. I dunno if they updated the rules since I read em last, but I remember it saying only toddlerkon and under (drawn in any way) was against the rules. For underage otherwise it was something like no 3D images if character looks prepubescent. Stylized and cartoony, or otherwise non-realistic drawings weren't breaking the rules.
I mean in the end, what are ya gonna do? It's a drawing of fictional characters. No harm done, minus all the ick factor triggerings amongst some peeps here and there. But hey, that's the internet for ya.
Anonymous14: Tsk, this age old arguement is literally on most every loli/shota pic on here. And all I'll say is this. If drawing underage cartoons fucking equates you to a pedophile that filmed real kids. Well then. Gonna be a lot of arrests going on because that would also mean anyone who drew a picture of someone dying or being raped/assaulted was a bystander that didn't call 911. And pretty much every shooter videogame player ever is a mass murderer. Cause y'know. You wanna treat some fantasy characters as real people, you have to treat all of them that way, right?
Do you see how ridiculous this is?
While certain sex fantasies are seen as way more taboo to hold, are they really any better or worse than your average person's murder/attack fantasy? When they see themselves strangling their annoying coworker in grave detail, maybe draw a character that looks disturbingly similar to said person being slaughtered in a comic or something?
It's all a crime in real life. That's what art/games/imagination is for in these cases. To vent desires. Individuals perceive them differently, some desires as sicker than others. But, given they spawned from human minds, like it or not, all dark desires are still human. Involuntary to a great extent.
They're ok to have, write, draw, vent through whatever personal means necessary. Just not ok to do to a non-consenting party.
If everyone could give mutual respect to that simple idea, I think there'd be a lot less fear, disgust, and arguing about these things.
Anonymous19: I’m not even gonna look at the thread, but if you ever make up the excuse that it’s “NOT PEDOPHILIA IF IT’S FICTIONAL!” That’s total bull shit. The character resembles someone under 18 physically and mentally. Fuck off with your bullshit excuses
Anonymous20: TAKE MY PORN AWAY AND I WILL START FUCKING LITTLE KIDS. THIS SITE HELPS ME TO EXPUNGE THOSE THOUGHTS. STUPID CHRISTFAGS. HYPOCRITES, THE LOT OF YOU, ON A WEBSITE JACKING OFF TO THE SAME STUFF AND SPOUTING INANE STUPID, RETARDED GARBAGE.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
...But that doesn't scan!! Oyyyyyyyyy....
I mean in the end, what are ya gonna do? It's a drawing of fictional characters. No harm done, minus all the ick factor triggerings amongst some peeps here and there. But hey, that's the internet for ya.
Do you see how ridiculous this is?
While certain sex fantasies are seen as way more taboo to hold, are they really any better or worse than your average person's murder/attack fantasy? When they see themselves strangling their annoying coworker in grave detail, maybe draw a character that looks disturbingly similar to said person being slaughtered in a comic or something?
It's all a crime in real life. That's what art/games/imagination is for in these cases. To vent desires. Individuals perceive them differently, some desires as sicker than others. But, given they spawned from human minds, like it or not, all dark desires are still human. Involuntary to a great extent.
They're ok to have, write, draw, vent through whatever personal means necessary. Just not ok to do to a non-consenting party.
If everyone could give mutual respect to that simple idea, I think there'd be a lot less fear, disgust, and arguing about these things.