tyciol: Even though softcore is allowed with <2pg of porn, I still think featuring non-porn still sort of the violates the point. In the very least, someone post a link to the DeviantArt so I can stalk the artist.
LadyStardust: This isn't even softcore. Here's a refresher on the rule concerning "softcore porn":
"If there is under one page of "real" porn of a character, then "soft" porn is allowed until there is enough "real" porn. By "soft", I mean ecchi, topless men, or lots of cleavage."
This picture is far from erotic. At the most it's "romantic". No one is topless, Crane is wearing a shirt, and even though it's only half on you can't even see any nip and I don't even think one could say there's "lots of cleavage". This picture shouldn't even be allowed on the site let alone be featured.
marcusabroad: It's nice enough as a pic, but the only softcore porn I can see is that gargoyle at the bottom right - you can sort of see its vagina... or at least its right pussy lip.
Anonymous24: I think I like this Image. It represents L(to, ME) the Scarecrow's Greatest Fear: That He Is GAY, and sexually attracted to The Batman! He's thinking, "He is looking good in that skin-tight outfit, and has me alone, and defenseless on this roof...Punish Me!"
LadyStardust: @marcusabroad: You're seeing things. That gargoyle is male and its crotch is clad in armor.
Also, I've never seen so many . . I believe people around here call them "samefags", in one comments section before. Anons 20 & 21 and Anon24 & Witchan are PRIME suspects.
This isn't 34, there is no loop-hole to this being 34 since it doesn't meet any of the qualifications for being softcore, and no number of people making multiple posts posing as different people saying how "wonderful" this picture is will change that.
Anonymous27: Gods DAMN it. We're /featuring/ this not-porn? This is fucking kid-safe. Hell, it even looks like Batman and a chick. Nothing that could run in a Disney movie (I'm not talking about those hidden-sex theories) should be on this site, much less featured. If there're less than 2 pages of a character, soft porn is allowed. This is not soft porn!
LadyStardust: @Titanium: Uh, no, how about you delete this NOW because it shouldn't be here and you know it? As a moderator it is your duty to uphold the rules to this site, not to bend them and even break them as you see fit.
If you LOVE this "Dr. Crane" so much why don't YOU go find some ACTUAL 34 of him instead of featuring something you know violates the rules because . . why? Is he your fetish? Are you on some kind of power trip? Honestly, if you're not going to follow the own rules you're supposed to be enforcing then you shouldn't have the position you currently hold.
Anonymous30(17): Titanium: There are 46 pics with the tag "Scarecrow", most of them with Jonathan Crane in them. People have just been too lazy to tag them with his name.
LadyStardust: Well Titanium, after following Anon33's lead and checking all the Scarecrow pics, I have tagged a number of them with "Jonathan Crane", since in those particular pics he is not in costume or at least not wearing his mask. Most of them include nudity, and there's even one by the same artist of this featured image where Crane's ass is completely uncovered.
I find it hard to believe that you at the very least didn't notice ONE of these other pics when you decided to feature this one, but I suppose everyone makes mistakes. I do wish though that you would admit to them instead of being stubborn. You hold a very important position here at Paheal. Shape up and fly right, or you might lose it. -LSD (Unofficial Moderator)
Titanium: LSD - You are not an unoffical moderator, and are in no position to say "Shape up and fly right, or you might lose it."
I was unaware of more pornographic pics of Jonathan Crane when I added this to my list of future features. I chose it because I liked it for it's art.
As you are aware, tags with less than 2 pages worth of material are allowed to contain "ecchi". You can argue whether this is "ecchi".
As LSD said, we all make mistakes. If you consider this one, so be it. Perhaps it wasn't the best choice. These featured images get changed every 2 to 4 days. If you don't like it just wait. Just remember wiiaboo's "stop crying" pic.
LadyStardust: Of course I consider it to be a mistake Tit, because it IS one. This picture is in no way perverted, it's simply romantic, and so it's NOT ecchi. I know it's not ecchi, YOU know it's not ecchi, so stop playing the "I'm a big ol tough moderator who knows best!" card and just get rid of it. Your incompetence sickens me . .
LadyStardust: @warrior: I only "annoy" staff members when they're not doing their job or ignoring the rules set forth by the creator of this site. Rule34d and Rat are VERY good at their jobs here and they're my bffs, and Tit maybe could take a lesson from their excellent performance records.
Of course . . I'd shut up if Tit would just say "I'm sorry, I know this image violates the rules, but I'm keeping it up anyway because (insert reason here)." His un-willingness to admit his obvious mistake is what annoys me, not the actual picture.
LadyStardust: And . . with the threat of a ban if I continue my crusade against incompetent moderators now looming over me, I will now "stfu". Good day. o.o
Titanium: LSD - You don't know 1/10 the work I do for this site. I just don't comment on images as much. I don't think the image violates the rules, but I am "sorry" for featuring it. Don't worry, Warrior won't ban you for saying your opinion (edit: you are unbanned).
LadyStardust: Well . . thank you for unbanning me. I was about ready to type up an angry e-mail to warrior. And I suppose that MAYBE I overreacted about this whole thing, and MAYBE was a little hard on you . . Wait, scratch that, I did overreact, and I was hard on you. I apologize. Friends? <3 (I hope I don't get banned again for not shutting up.)
Rat: Indeed you have no need to worry LSD, not even PRESIDENT OBAMA can keep you banned when I'm around, and I always am and forever will be, no matter what.
LadyStardust: Hey, he's not president YET, he's only the president elect. Many things can happen between now and January . . >:) . . . I'm only joking, I don't wish death upon the man, but SHAME on you for trying to get me started on politics again! The people here hate it when I bring that stuff up. >.<;
Anonymous36: Anonymous 26, back for more. Again, this is a good image. The subject matter may, or may not be your particular cup of tea, but, you can't deny that. Case closed
Serealkiller: Damn, I've never sread so much drama and hatred over a feature before. As far as I'm concerned, Rule 34 states that if it exists there is porn of it. To me this is implied porn. Porn is going to happen here. We just see the "before sex" scene.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Pairings like this are usually enjoyed by either gay fans or , suprisingly, female fans (who like 'Yaoi'), and I believe Candra is female.
- Reply
It makes me a little sad, knowing that as soon as I imagined this that there would be a vore image of my idea already on someone's template...
also, I see a serious lack of rule 34 content
<ten seconds later>
"They scream...and they cry..."
NOW...
DAMMIT NOW
RIGHT NOW DAMMIT.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
"If there is under one page of "real" porn of a character, then "soft" porn is allowed until there is enough "real" porn. By "soft", I mean ecchi, topless men, or lots of cleavage."
This picture is far from erotic. At the most it's "romantic". No one is topless, Crane is wearing a shirt, and even though it's only half on you can't even see any nip and I don't even think one could say there's "lots of cleavage". This picture shouldn't even be allowed on the site let alone be featured.
- Reply
- Reply
Robin ( any of them )
catwoman
Batgirl
Harly Quinn
NO >:O
- Reply
- Reply
Oh for fuck sake...!
Also, I've never seen so many . . I believe people around here call them "samefags", in one comments section before. Anons 20 & 21 and Anon24 & Witchan are PRIME suspects.
This isn't 34, there is no loop-hole to this being 34 since it doesn't meet any of the qualifications for being softcore, and no number of people making multiple posts posing as different people saying how "wonderful" this picture is will change that.
- Reply
- Reply
Somebody Fucking failed, and failed hard.
- Reply
- Reply
also we've featured notpr0n before.
>>135418
If you LOVE this "Dr. Crane" so much why don't YOU go find some ACTUAL 34 of him instead of featuring something you know violates the rules because . . why? Is he your fetish? Are you on some kind of power trip? Honestly, if you're not going to follow the own rules you're supposed to be enforcing then you shouldn't have the position you currently hold.
- Reply
I find it hard to believe that you at the very least didn't notice ONE of these other pics when you decided to feature this one, but I suppose everyone makes mistakes. I do wish though that you would admit to them instead of being stubborn. You hold a very important position here at Paheal. Shape up and fly right, or you might lose it. -LSD (Unofficial Moderator)
- Reply
I was unaware of more pornographic pics of Jonathan Crane when I added this to my list of future features. I chose it because I liked it for it's art.
As you are aware, tags with less than 2 pages worth of material are allowed to contain "ecchi". You can argue whether this is "ecchi".
As LSD said, we all make mistakes. If you consider this one, so be it. Perhaps it wasn't the best choice. These featured images get changed every 2 to 4 days. If you don't like it just wait. Just remember wiiaboo's "stop crying" pic.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
stfu about this before I ban you. I'm bored.
Of course . . I'd shut up if Tit would just say "I'm sorry, I know this image violates the rules, but I'm keeping it up anyway because (insert reason here)." His un-willingness to admit his obvious mistake is what annoys me, not the actual picture.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
BTW Titanium, I like this pic for it´s "Gothic" atmosphere. And you´re right, the art for itself is gorgeous!
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
o3o
P.S. - How's that art comin along? <3
- Reply
I'll send you a pm on gaia with a link so you can see what it looks like so far. ^^
But yeah, besides the gayness, the art is really nice.
I no long believe in rule 34.
- Reply
But I still epically love this picture.
Tell me, would this be mind-devastating if it was made by an eight year-old with Down's syndrome and Parkinson's in MS Paint?
No.
The more well done and erotic it is, the more disturbing it is to the non-insane crowd.
Anywhom, back to fapping.
- Reply
Ugh, other fangirls, always fucking shit up. :/
We need moar yuri fangirls like me.
- Reply