Trans: Anon1, you really are sad. You post the same shit in every Opela edit. You're obsessed about him, and it's getting pathetic level. Notice how you're always the first one to post. Stay in your own lane, you fat ugly piece of shit, faggot.
Anonymous10: I like how you're all making this 'can you do better?' argument as if you're arguing over something important. You're all here jerking off to cartoons and acting like you're important because one character gets you harder than another character.
Anonymous11(5): Important is in the eye of the beholder. Some think Jackson Pollock's work is "important". Since all life will perish eventually anyhow, nothing mankind has done, does or will do in the future is "important".
Anonymous12(10): Jackson Pollock didn't copy and paste a characters face over someone else's cartoon porn. Comparing the leading force of abstract expressionism to this nonsense is flat out doltish.
Anonymous14(5): Getting a life is in the eye of the beholder. What exactly does "get a life" imply? Normalcy such as debt, dysfunction, disillusionment, divorce and powerlessness in the face of the elitist scumbags who rape the masses and seek to reestablish the medieval version of peasantry. Enjoy your version of life. The concept of "lonely" is self imposed. Anyone who thinks that they are not alone in life is lying to themselves. You come into this world alone and you leave it alone. Many people are married or have significant others and still have a deep sense of feeling alone. The ability to dwell with oneself alone without feeling "lonely" is a blessing that many of you will never be able to attain. Jackson Pollock's so-called "abstract expressionism" is shit and could be reproduced by an elephant or an ape. True artists include Albrecht Durer and Gustave Dore and Carravagio.
Anonymous15: @Anonymous: Axiology is in the eye of the beholder. Art, life, and other things lack inherent value, requiring an arbitrary scale of measurement imposed by humans. In this case, the basic assumption is that arguing about edits of cartoon porn is of trivial concern.
Of course, this is of no concern to someone being willfully obtuse for the sake of being an asshole on the internet.
tl;dr lmao weebs (although I will say the edit is surprisingly good, as far as edits go)
Anonymous16(5): I would agree that arguing about cartoon porn edits is trivial to nearly all of us, but who is really being the assholes here? In my view its those who post comments trying to sound enlightened or on some type of intellectual higher plane by attacking others for what they perceive as being trivial disagreement and like to end it with attack statements like "you are all acting like you're important" or "Get a life - all of you. This site is for the lonely losers." I'm simply responding to what I perceive as being assholish in the first place to those who act like they aren't actually in the same website boat as the rest of us. I don't need an echo chamber to read my own statements to improve my intellectual self esteem, nor do I claim any form of superiority over my fellow lurkers even if they choose to argue over what I may perceive as being petty such as cartoon porn edits. I'm not being willfully obtuse if in fact I actually perceive the world to be this way.
- Reply
Of course, this is of no concern to someone being willfully obtuse for the sake of being an asshole on the internet.
tl;dr lmao weebs (although I will say the edit is surprisingly good, as far as edits go)