Please read our Rules and continue to report content that violates our rules on underage content.
main image
- Reply
Anonymous1: What the fuck is this shit
- Reply
Anonymous2: looks like a barbie doll in the vulva area. D artist does not want to draw pussy!
avatar
- Reply
ofag: @Anonymous: It's an edit of Blushmallet's picture. Although I think the edited pussy actually looks less-bad than the original.
- Reply
Anonymous3: I dont know if the guy who edited this is dumb or just hates dark colored people
- Reply
Anonymous4: So we're white-washing porn now? Let alone porn drawn by a dark skinned artist? Jesus Christ I hope mallet doesn't see this.
- Reply
Anonymous5: stop fucking complaining about skin colour, the more you whine the longer the issue lasts.
like when you call your heavily christian anti-gay anti-black neighbours ass-holes they don't think "Oh actually Tyrone next door makes a good point I am an ass-hole" no, they think "What a dirty negro faggot disrespecting my god"
let's fucking face it though, Priyanka's natural skin colours would have near to no contrast against the dress colour and the hair would muddy the contrast further, not bad just not artistically sound from a colour choice perspective.
also who the fuck actually gives a shit, this is just for mild preference people on this site jerk off to dog people, I don't think they care all too much about the skin pigmentation and the melanin count.
- Reply
Anonymous6(5): @Anonymous: did you see the original?
- Reply
Anonymous7(5): @Anonymous: Yes, there is definitely a contrast there, but less so, personally though I think my point still stands, although the skin in both looks unhealthy.
the original looks red and cancerous where as this one looks milky not unlike different cancer.
- Reply
Anonymous8: @Anonymous: You're really suggesting that we should just let bigots be bigots and never correct them and call them out for their disgusting bullshit? Yeah, um, how about you go fuck yourself?
avatar
- Reply
NotGayFagget: This sucks!


Report an ad?