fishmonger: Sunny Tennyson is a real character. She is described in UA as follows: "In Ultimate Alien, in her human disguise, Sunny was the spitting image of Gwen, with the exceptions of her having black hair that hung free, instead of red hair in a ponytail, and dark blue eyes rather than green eyes." I think this artist just took that description and applied it to make her similar to Gwen's appearance in the original Ben 10 series.
fishmonger: @fishmonger: Woops excuse me, I misspoke... I meant Sunny is a real character. She wasn't a Tennyson, though. So this isn't a fan-made character, but the tag should be changed to just "Sunny."
Anonymous1: This can still be considered as a fan made character since this appearance isn't canon and the real sunnie doesn't look anything like this.
Also this character never existed in the first series so this oc look is based in assumptions only.
CaptainBoomer: @Anonymous: Oh fuck off. The site is full of artistic reimaginings of characters. They're fine with "What if Link from Zelda was a My Little Pony" and "What if Marge Simpson was made out of LEGO"; "What if a clone of a certain character in series Y was based on that same character in series X of the same franchise instead" is fucking nothing.
Don't like it, make an account and blacklist the tag. They've given you the tools to fix your problem - take your hand out of your ass and do it.
Anonymous2(1): @CaptainBoomer: >The site is full of autistic reimaginings of characters.
FTFY
The fact that it's usually done doesn't mean is right, that's why you can report shit like this. It's not that I think it's crap, it's about trying to keep this site running a bit cleaner from morons commissioning their ocs and trying to justify it when they end here.
That's why I'm taking my fist out of your ass and report it, and I'll keep doing so :^)
Anonymous3: Anonymous2(1): >Calls reimagining of other characters autistic
>Declares war on some site they have no power or influence on over their own/someone else's equally autistic reimagining of a character
Man, you DA control freaks are delusional as always. Due to this "autistic reimagining" still trying to represent the actual copyrighted character, it cannot be called an OC and gives you/them no ground to stand on in demanding their removal here.
Urbane_Guerrilla: I could start a one-man campaign against the solecism "spitting image." Huuck-ptooie! Eww, bronze boogers. It's understandable, when the intermediate stage was clearly "spit'n'image," but the less nonsensical original is "spit AND image," spit being dialect for "spirit," for "spirit and image." Curiously enough, the meaning remains accurate.
Also this character never existed in the first series so this oc look is based in assumptions only.
- Reply
Don't like it, make an account and blacklist the tag. They've given you the tools to fix your problem - take your hand out of your ass and do it.
FTFY
The fact that it's usually done doesn't mean is right, that's why you can report shit like this. It's not that I think it's crap, it's about trying to keep this site running a bit cleaner from morons commissioning their ocs and trying to justify it when they end here.
That's why I'm taking my fist out of your ass and report it, and I'll keep doing so :^)
- Reply
>Declares war on some site they have no power or influence on over their own/someone else's equally autistic reimagining of a character
Man, you DA control freaks are delusional as always. Due to this "autistic reimagining" still trying to represent the actual copyrighted character, it cannot be called an OC and gives you/them no ground to stand on in demanding their removal here.