Anonymous2: @Anonymous: Why? Because the penis wasn't the same color as your own? I was making fun of people calling these edits racist, but you people who say the originals are "bad" because of skin color are just as bad.
Like, come on, use a bit of imagination instead of complaining about the originals having black people 80% of the time. It doesn't bother me, and I'm as white as they get, so I fail to see why it bothers you.
Here I go again, writing paragraphs to try to reason with random people on R34 of all places...
Anonymous8: skin edits like this are spam cancer regardless of the color of the original but i never seen any white washers get even close to black washers like abcdman123 that have over 700 posts for example
Anonymous12: A talent-less cuck/black guy makes a white to black edit => totally fine.
A white/asian guy makes a black to white edit that actually looks decent => OH MY GOD, THAT'S SO RACIST! LYNCH THIS MAN!
Anonymous14: I don't think the original was supposed to be a black guy. I think making random faceless dudes have dark skin is how some artists indicate that the guy is supposed to be "anonymous" and that you're just supposed to imagine that it's you.
Like, come on, use a bit of imagination instead of complaining about the originals having black people 80% of the time. It doesn't bother me, and I'm as white as they get, so I fail to see why it bothers you.
Here I go again, writing paragraphs to try to reason with random people on R34 of all places...
Maybe the Mae one as well.
That anon is straight up calling them fixes
A white/asian guy makes a black to white edit that actually looks decent => OH MY GOD, THAT'S SO RACIST! LYNCH THIS MAN!