Anonymous12: The ones in this comments section blaming us for clicking this have to be fucking trolls cuz yall ass clicked on this image yourselves how tf else did u comment on this then u fucking hypocrites.
Anonymous29: @Anonymous: Thats fucking stupid, it might be a drawing but its still a drawing of a KID. The kid in the picture is what matters, and whether or not it is fictional doesn't mean anything. If the figure of a child, fictional or not arouses you: YOU ARE A PEDO! A SHAMELESS KIDDIE TOUCHER WHO WILL COME UP WITH THE WEIRDEST SHIT THE HUMAN MIND CAN POSSIBLY GIVE BIRTH TO, JUST TO TRY AND PROTECT THE FACT THAT THEY INFACT would rather fuck a child than a lady. You can call it a drawing all you want as your coping mechanism, you are still fucked (in the head).
Anonymous30(28): @Anonymous: never once touched a kid. Never will, I will never understand how some people (such as you) cry over fictional characters being drawn lewd. Grow up and figure out the difference between a pedo and someone who looks at ART
Anonymous36: I'd like to remind the bitchy whiny morons where you are. Rule 34. If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions. You do know you can't just "stumble" across this image. You had to search it up. Don't start acting like we're the villains here. You are just as bad as us for laying eyes on this content. Plus, this isn’t a child. It’s a fictional character. If I wanted to, i could copy this pixel for pixel, and slap the number “18” on it, and its instantly acceptable.
- Reply
- Reply
Defending drawings will stop the real problem out there
Smh people are stupid
- Reply
Please keep arguing
- Reply
- Reply