Anonymous2: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Some would argue that posting "porn" of a nameless person supposedly representing a vague concept as a flimsy excuse to flood the site with Nazi propaganda should be a "bannishable" offense.
Anonymous4: maybe you could use your brain for just a second and add a penis to the image. nah, thinking is for left wingers, let's keep whining about the website rules.
Noka: Once again, bonerific surprises no one by uploading something nobody wants to see. And once again seems to have an odd fixation on telling people they'll never be a woman, for...some reason.
Farfegnugen: @bonerific: ... I didn't say anything about a Dupe report. No, the original image you had uploaded was deleted with the reason "Not Porn" by an admin. Now, unless you got permission to reupload this, you do not reupload removed images. Don't tell me did if you didn't because I will verify if you did. Don't lie.
Besides, it's not really a false report when the only nude person is a generic female. Stop, your "feminism" is an OC. If the only one that is nude is the OC, then it's not allowed. The Happy Merchant is below 60 images, so it can technically stay until he's above 60. However, if you wake up and find this image gone again, don't bother reuploading the same shit. If you do, you are gone, for good.
@bonerific: Good because I don't want to be a woman... The fuck does that even mean? Is that some kind of QAnon mind control bullshit?
Farfegnugen: @bonerific: " I gave you my reasons in my first post." "There's a feminist showing her tits. Making false reports should be a bannishable offense " And I told you what you shouldn't be doing in my first post.
"This isn't the first time I have seen it." If you think we think we are infallible, you think wrong. We fuck up, you are welcome to call us out when we do. Before you say it, this shit is still technically not porn.
"the mods or whoever will add "not porn" or "not rule 34" simply because they don't like it" Yet, most of your images are on the site.
"Other times, the mod will delete shit without warning." What sense does it make that we give a warning to something we will delete? If it's not porn, what good is that warning going to do. Now, we'll tell you if you do the same time too many times because we want you to knock that shit off before it becomes a bigger issue. Like reuploading the same image.
"another thing is if you delete images because you don't like it---that is thought policing." You are a giant ass leap in logic. No, you are welcome to upload any dumb ass meme crap you can find on 8chan. But it's got to porn of something considered Rule 34. Happy Merchant is Rule 34 because it exist in media as a stereotype, but it needs to be porn. Your "feminism" lady I won't Rule 34 since that a generalization.
" Of course, this isn't about the rules, this is about full blown-censorship" Oh, please. Get the fuck over yourself. Put away the victim card. We only censor words that edgelords say all the time. Maybe more clever with your racism.
"Second, what's this whole "you need permission" bullshit?" The fuck are you talking about? "Now, unless you got permission to reupload this", was about reuploading this image after being deleted, not what contents you can/can't upload. You can upload Hitler doing creak off Biden's ass as long as follows the rules.
Noka: @bonerific: "Even if an image falls within [Rule 8 &] Rule 34, the mods or whoever will add "not porn" or "not rule 34" simply because they don't like it." If you're talking about reports, you realize users file those reports, and then mods or admins act on them, right? Admins/mods don't flag something as not porn/34 and then just...don't delete it. What sort of fucking sense would that make?
Farfegnugen: @bonerific: Nope, that's not me. But it is a user that should know better. I won't ban them since they weren't patting themselves on the back.
Hell, I really don't see the point in logging out, posting a comment as an Anon, and then logging back in half a minute later. What's there to hide?
Anonymous10: @Farfegnugen: I just logged back in to do some janitorial stuff. I was just teasing him for being paranoid is all
And if you ARE gonna ban me, slap me on the DNP cause I'll want NOTHING to do with this hellhole, even if it takes over half a year to get on it lol
Farfegnugen: @Anonymous: Yeah, thanks for helping making that non-issue into an issue. You were a giant help. He was paranoid enough without you stirring the pot.
Then again, if he would post actual Rule 34 instead of clips of pornstars, he would have less to worry about.
Anonymous11: @bonerific: it's insane how much of a fucking loser you are Bonerific. All your uploads are absolute utter shit and no one wants to see them. Not only all your uploads should be deleted for being pointless crap spam you should be banned for uploading said crap... I'm tired of seeing your garbage here, I come to this site to watch porn not your stupid unfunny political bullshit.
Anonymous17: Democrats, who are mostly NOT jews, should go kill themselves if they actually know what they are doing, like eventually trying to put everyone in gulags like what bernie sanders ppl said.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Besides, it's not really a false report when the only nude person is a generic female. Stop, your "feminism" is an OC. If the only one that is nude is the OC, then it's not allowed. The Happy Merchant is below 60 images, so it can technically stay until he's above 60. However, if you wake up and find this image gone again, don't bother reuploading the same shit. If you do, you are gone, for good.
@bonerific: Good because I don't want to be a woman... The fuck does that even mean? Is that some kind of QAnon mind control bullshit?
- Reply
"This isn't the first time I have seen it." If you think we think we are infallible, you think wrong. We fuck up, you are welcome to call us out when we do. Before you say it, this shit is still technically not porn.
"the mods or whoever will add "not porn" or "not rule 34" simply because they don't like it" Yet, most of your images are on the site.
"Other times, the mod will delete shit without warning." What sense does it make that we give a warning to something we will delete? If it's not porn, what good is that warning going to do. Now, we'll tell you if you do the same time too many times because we want you to knock that shit off before it becomes a bigger issue. Like reuploading the same image.
"another thing is if you delete images because you don't like it---that is thought policing." You are a giant ass leap in logic. No, you are welcome to upload any dumb ass meme crap you can find on 8chan. But it's got to porn of something considered Rule 34. Happy Merchant is Rule 34 because it exist in media as a stereotype, but it needs to be porn. Your "feminism" lady I won't Rule 34 since that a generalization.
" Of course, this isn't about the rules, this is about full blown-censorship" Oh, please. Get the fuck over yourself. Put away the victim card. We only censor words that edgelords say all the time. Maybe more clever with your racism.
"Second, what's this whole "you need permission" bullshit?" The fuck are you talking about? "Now, unless you got permission to reupload this", was about reuploading this image after being deleted, not what contents you can/can't upload. You can upload Hitler doing creak off Biden's ass as long as follows the rules.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Hell, I really don't see the point in logging out, posting a comment as an Anon, and then logging back in half a minute later. What's there to hide?
And if you ARE gonna ban me, slap me on the DNP cause I'll want NOTHING to do with this hellhole, even if it takes over half a year to get on it lol
- Reply
Then again, if he would post actual Rule 34 instead of clips of pornstars, he would have less to worry about.
- Reply