Anonymous1: Misandrists of the Universe? That works. I also would’ve accepted Emasculators of the Universe. The west’s creative bankruptcy and nostalgia mining knows no bounds. I can’t wait for female centric G.I. Joe or a Twitter approved Conan the Barbarian project to get off the ground so it can tell everyone how bad toxic masculinity is.
Look, can't we all agree that the problem isn't so much an agenda and the fact that we need something original off the ground? I mean, this new He-Man certainly tried, but it just didn't have the same spark as She-Ra did. As for the actual art, Mark had a few things to say in the description that I hope somebody gets onto here.
Anonymous3(1): @Anonymous: Oh, the fans don’t like a thing? Lets blame them and call them shitheads! That’s a good way to do business. Maybe if you blockheads didn’t have a learning disability, you’d realize why Ghostbusters 2016 underperformed instead of wondering why so many of your diversity propaganda projects crash and burn so hard. I don’t laugh at how pathetic you are, I’d have to muster the effort just to pity you.
Anonymous4: @Pyroking: The problem is the agenda. Look at Star Wars. An actual third trilogy would have been welcomed, but instead, it become a progress pride parade of incompetency.
The root of the issue is that the same people who shove agendas into everything can't write at all. Only if they go will anything good be made, but they won't, because the agenda is what protects them.
Anonymous5(1): @Anonymous: I never watched Steven’s Universe so I can’t comment on the merits of the show itself but at least it was its own thing and not borrowing or piggybacking on the success of someone else’s work. If you’re working on an established IP with pre-existing characters and a fan base that carried the thing for years, you have to respect it and tread lightly. Unfortunately the people who hijack such things usually fo not give a damn and just stomp all over it and than get defensive when people object to their total disregard and lack of care. And the progressive attack dogs that follow these hacks are usually the most intolerant and toxic cunts you’ve ever laid eyes on. Like if I’m not mistaken, Steven U fans bullied an artist for drawing a fan art thing where they slimmed a character down? And they have the audacity to talk like they’re enlightened people above all of this shit telling people to grow up. Fucking wankers.
Anonymous7(1): @Anonymous: You’d think that if capitalism and monetary gain was the focus, there’d be an effort to put something out there of quality that people would actually like and not crap all over fans that don’t and ignore any criticism that would actually clue these bean counters in onto what people want and are willing to spend their money on.
Anonymous8(4): @Anonymous: Which one of you commie faggots first thought "chud" was insulting to anyone other than the person using it? Are you a Beavis and Butthead character? Heh heh heh chud.
Anonymous10(4): @Anonymous: Why would I bother trying to "overrided" YOUR "affirmation"? It was a legitimate question. Which one of you retards thought that was a good insult? I guess it's hard to come up with something when the people you're trying to insult are the normal ones.
- Reply
Look, can't we all agree that the problem isn't so much an agenda and the fact that we need something original off the ground? I mean, this new He-Man certainly tried, but it just didn't have the same spark as She-Ra did. As for the actual art, Mark had a few things to say in the description that I hope somebody gets onto here.
The root of the issue is that the same people who shove agendas into everything can't write at all. Only if they go will anything good be made, but they won't, because the agenda is what protects them.