Anonymous6: yeah tis is so obviously a trace cause teh one on left is same pose as one on right
serieously, enough with these pics, just because to pics have the same pose and objects in them does not mean its a freaking trace. With the amount of porn on the internet, its INEVITABLE that stuff would be similar, no matter what the drawing skills of the artists are.
Anonymous7: Jesus. Maybe "trace" should wordfilter to "I'M A RETARD" or something, because a lot of people on this site have no idea what the word means.
Yes, the pose is pretty directly stolen, but it obvious at as glance that it's not traced. None of the proportions match.
nagger: Doesn't look like a straight trace to me, but the picture does seem a bit too similar to be a coincidence (the pose, the bottle, even the painting in the background - not traced, but very much the same idea).
Either the first image was used as reference for the second, or there's a third picture they both used as reference material. Neither option would be that uncommon (or objectionable, IMO - there's a huge difference between tracing and using reference material).
Anonymous13: its only a typical pose if you are a foot fag... which apparently both "artists" are.
Its obviously not a trace in a single glance, it might be a copied pose, it might (but less likely) be coincidence, but its not a trace...
Nowhereman-SinisterSerpent-: @Anonymous:
Agree whit this guy, because then, ALL my pics are traced, I am sorry, but I cant remember something I dont know how it looks like, hell, then all the pics on the same tags in GELBOORU ( a superior booru to this) are all traces.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
GET THE INTERNET POLICE!
Head id different, and even the hand spreading the pussy. Try it yourselves.
Again.
serieously, enough with these pics, just because to pics have the same pose and objects in them does not mean its a freaking trace. With the amount of porn on the internet, its INEVITABLE that stuff would be similar, no matter what the drawing skills of the artists are.
Yes, the pose is pretty directly stolen, but it obvious at as glance that it's not traced. None of the proportions match.
Either the first image was used as reference for the second, or there's a third picture they both used as reference material. Neither option would be that uncommon (or objectionable, IMO - there's a huge difference between tracing and using reference material).
Not a trace, fag.
You beat me too it...
Its obviously not a trace in a single glance, it might be a copied pose, it might (but less likely) be coincidence, but its not a trace...
- Reply
Agree whit this guy, because then, ALL my pics are traced, I am sorry, but I cant remember something I dont know how it looks like, hell, then all the pics on the same tags in GELBOORU ( a superior booru to this) are all traces.
- Reply