Anonymous3(1): Not really, I think your deductions are based on some personal beliefs or preferences not shared by the party you're addressing. You will have to elaborate or be satisfied with not getting your point across.
Sintime: Coming from someone who's uploaded things like this
>>458383 >>458449 >>474140 You have a very weak argument which falls apart on itself. It's not based on personal belief it's based on observation and psychology, which leads to you most likely being insecure with yourself. There's nothing really to elaborate on, I know what you're going to say, and which pattern you're going to follow for reasons which contradict themselves
Anonymous4(1): Hahaha, I bet you're one of those types of people that calls a woman racist if she's unattracted to black guys, too. 'Psychology' indeed...
Anonymous5(1): Oh. I thought you were linking to some of my other fixed pictures, like >>542171. Uploading father bear porn makes me insecure? That's a really convoluted viewpoint.
Sintime: More like calling you out for having bad reasons despite uploading bestiality and males with oversized cocks, despite all that, those things seemed fine with youu and were more animal than Balrog, how does a human male video game character that seems more normal than the earlier (one being an actual animal, and the other being a green-man beast animal with another male)bother you to the point of removing him from the picture? It can only lead to probably being insecure with yourself over pigment. Likewise, it's been ingrained into your mind by similar thinking people of insecure nature to think that way, tt seems I'm arguing with another kid here who's probably experienced most things from his computer and basement.
Anonymous6(1): Rofl, what part of 'shitstain', 'ugly gorillas' and 'unattractive black people' don't you understand? Yeah I'm insecure for not loving the black cock.
Sintime: Like I said earlier, insecure elitism because you're fearful of your self esteem being damaged. But, somehow you missed those other things you've uploaded which are worse? Funny how a "human" can self-identify with cartoon characters and unrealisticly ugly things, but yet distance themselves far away from another human because of pigment insecurity problems, usually needing to place the label of "animal" on it instead, or something else removing humanity from said target, makes you think who the real "unhuman" things are?
Sintime: Just pointing out how your intial reasons were bad ones, despite you yourself uploading pictures of males and half-animal beings, and pointing and drawing out your insecurity, which is working quite well. Stop sending me pm's btw, if you're going to say something, say it here. So everyone can see your "argument"
Anonymous9(1): So it's still about people not being attracted to ugly gorillas, then. Okay. You really should be more respectful of people's preferences, this is turning in to discrimination on your part buddy!
Sintime: You've uploaded pictures of ugly gorillas, and vying to correlate yourself as better than a fictional character, is even more hilarious. Maybe you should upload more pictures of Blanka to help in having a cohorent argument.
Anonymous10(1): Hey, to each their own, if you're attracted to ugly half retarded niggerapes like Balrog then that's your deal Sintime, but don't be fucking racist to Blanka.
Sintime: Like I said, in pm's it's easy to see which pattern you're following, Blanka is more of an "ape" and uglier than Balrog, you declare these things, yet you've seen nothing but pm's of things relating to black cocks and anal sex, to me, it seems someone has a bit of a self-guilt issue as well? Maybe you're like one of those preachers who promotes Anti-Gay laws, yet goes out at night dressed in Drag? Seems to make a bit of sense, sometimes people project their insecurity onto other people, or into what they say.
Anonymous11(1): If you knew anything about me, you'd know I'm way more gay than straight and am open about it. :P Also a xenophile. attractive and successful Africans are just super ugly, straight up.
Sintime: I don't want to know anything about you, there's nothing to know as most people up here are just carbon copies of each other.
So, you're a gay "racist", you probably complain about equal treatment, or wanting respect as well, but you act the same based on someone due to something they can't change vs something they can change. By the same standards you place labels on someone else due to self-esteem and insecurity issues, society easily places you at the bottom, for the same reasons, and I'm sure you aware of it, hence your need for thinking you're entitled to being "better" than someone, even when you realize that you aren't.
Anonymous12(1): I said 'mostly gay', most people call it 'bi', I prefer 'greek'. Males and females both possessing beauty, etc. But we're getting off track. Why exactly are you so furious that I took out the giant niggerdick?
Sintime: Social conformity in terms of what you've been conditioned into thinking is better through propaganda and false advertising through media? I'm just pointing out you're insecure with yourself, and using negative opinions to help with your self esteem issues, which I intially stated from the start.
Anonymous13(1): It's pretty commonly understood that hetero- and homo- were not recognized prefixes to the Greeks. But again you're getting off track. I'm trying to figure out why you're so mad about be taking away the niggerdick and you're refusing to address the issue at hand!
Sintime: I never said I was angry, or anything of that nature, I simply pointed out you're inescure with yourself, read.
Also, there was much more civilizations before Greeks that did similar things, nothing ever done is new, or original. Finding labels to put on something doesn't change what it is, but only pleases the person using the label to their own ends, in your case, helping you feel better about yourself.
Anonymous14(1): Indeed, but the best recorded incidents are with the Greeks. It's present in their art and literature, more clearly than anywhere else in the world. So having a 'greek mentality' usually means that the gender itself does not matter and neither should labels. But, once again, we're getting off point. Personal attacks and arguing with me over my sexuality comes off as rather angry, rofl. Here's how I see it: I take away the ugly nig, you respond with "YOU'RE INSECURE!" because I took away the best part of the picture for you, and now you're trying to rationalize it by attacking my character. Low, Sintime. Very low.
Sintime: The best recorded incidents isn't with the Greeks, it's through promotion and propaganda of so called American "History" which is just Eurocentrism in disguise, it tells one small portion of the history of the world and displays all other people as savage or underdeveloped. I'm pretty sure you've never heard of Sumeria, which is a much more valid claim if you're going to pretend you understand anything of culture, or literature, which you don't, it doesn't work that way, you don't just interject a culture somewhere in the middle and claim it's so "great" without looking at what it was influenced by, what came before it, and how it developed according to its precursors. Civilizations use things from other civilizations,like I said, nothing is new or oringinal, even though people have the habbit of erasing the original author and putting their name down, this is done numerous times throughout history, even more so in the "Greek" history, which "claimed concepts" as their own without giving credit the original source, off topic, but I could write an Essay here, but that would be a waste of time given majority of the audience. I'm saying you're insecure because your "character" moved you to edit out a fictional video game character out of a picture, despite uploading worse material previously. Another bad argument on your part.
Anonymous17(1): I'm a college man, I've studied Sumeria, but show me a gallery of Sumerian pottery clearly showing homosexuality. :) You can't. Sintime, honestly, you're getting off on a tangent that I'm uninterested in, lol. I'm not even sure of the point you're trying to make at this point, it's like you're venting your anger by trying to redefine history to suit you...
Sintime: You obiviously couldn't apply anything you learned in this "psuedo" college you went to, otherwise you wouldn't be so sub-mammal yourself, (sorry, don't think you've made it to the mammal class yet,) You're saying you're "uninterested" yet you've set me several pm's because your self esteem was damaged, trying to keep the conversation private so no one would see what you were saying, if you weren't insecure, you wouldn't care what anyone sees of what you type.
Also me trying to redefine history, not likely, maybe I have a broader sense of history than you do, other than (GREEK GREEK THE WORLD STARTED WITH GREECE) as I said before civilizations are not islands, they take elements from each other, be it people around them, or nature itself.
You're probably one of those people who watch a movie about the middle ages and think things were exactly the way they were by the methods displayed of that movie.
Homosexuality has existed since before man even appeared, pretending Greece was the only place homosexuality was open and occuring is a logical fallacy, civilizations usually record their activities and express themselves through writing.
Anonymous22(1): Titanium, tl;dr: I erase attractive and successful African, Sintime asspained because he loves niggercock, claims I’m insecure for not finding attractive and successful Africans attractive. Sintime begins arguing about my halfhomoness, dwelling on my casual mention of greek sexual mentality because I don’t mention that may-or-may-not-have celebrated gayness.. Sintime continuing to send me PMs despite claiming he wasn’t going to answer me anymore. Sintime still mad.
Sintime: Not mad, just into your head, and you're pretty easy to deduct and explain, you're simple minded, and not really good at having an argument and you're repeating yourself in pms, everything you mention you don't know anything of or warp it to fit your small biased opinion of what you want it to be, It's obivious you're out of your leauge and you need your insecurity issue as you main focal point of defense.
Anonymous23(1): Oh dude you're totally right, you're so IN MY BRAINNNN, my mindsa blowin'!! From me not mentioning every ancient civilization before Christianity and from me from me posting a picture of Father Bear you've 'deduced' that I'm somehow insecure and simple minded! You're like some kinda psychology WYZURD broham.
Anonymous25(1): Took some time to reread in an effort to understand your point. But read the very first lines of your little bitchfit, Sintime. From the very beginning you were linking completely unrelated pictures and shoving all kinds of assumptions on me over them ‘based on psychology and observation’. The only ‘psychology’ involved was your deeply seated psychological obsession with discrediting someone that doesn’t like attractive and successful Africans. So from the very beginning, in your head, it was “I’m going to draw a conclusion and then try to prove it NO MATTER WHAT.” Like a stubborn Christian. And just like a stubborn Christian, no matter how much I say “THIS does not mean THIS”, you’ll plug your ears and keep throwing your bitchfit, to the point of spamming a single picture, even when I only reply with a few disinterested sentences and try to keep the entire tl:dr conversation off an image's page. You're personally invested.
Anonymous26(1): If you have anymore insecure attempts at discrediting me, go ahead. But no one gives a fuck though, so take it to PMs. Better yet, get used to the real world were people just don't like attractive and successful Africans.
Sintime: Look at how angry you've become over a simple line of saying "Someone is insecure with themselves", replying to that automatically donates you, and the fact, that youre bringing unlated religious zeal into this makes it even more piteful for your part, did Christians bash you or something? I'm sure they have before. You're replying several times out of anger to 1 sentence, think about that, I'm just pointing out what's in you and letting others see it, which has been commented on accordingly, but even a bitch doesnt cry in my pm box over and over again about being insecure and secretly loving black cocks and feeling self guilt over it, most just reply back on the picture, we don't want to call you a bitch, that would make female dogs look bad.Funny how you should call spamming with your multi replies to a single reply from me, isn't that a bit hypocritical? You're name is fitting though, but coming to terms with your insecurity and self guilt is just one of those things in your life you're just going to have to overcome.
a_non_anon: I didn't think the original picture's comments thread could be beat, but this one did it.
Notspam should be applauded in de-Africanizing it, for it is truly God's work.
Anonymous32: This is just the most surreal series of comments I've ever seen.
An argument between some faggot nazi (I didn't even know nazis were allowed to be gay), and some faux-psych major who takes faggot nazis too seriously.
And then original artist steps in a shuts everyone the hell up.
meow-meow: this was painful to read...
mostly sintime's parts actually.
sorry but you contradict yourself too many times, or appear to.
and try to rely on what you consider facts when in fact... or how i should say, it is probably impossible to truly know anything, let alone refer to things as facts
Anonymous34: @Anonymous: I'd be surprised if anyone took R34 and anyone who uses it seriously, what with a constant hate boner for every race in like 85% of the users.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
>>458383
>>458449
>>474140
You have a very weak argument which falls apart on itself. It's not based on personal belief it's based on observation and psychology, which leads to you most likely being insecure with yourself. There's nothing really to elaborate on, I know what you're going to say, and which pattern you're going to follow for reasons which contradict themselves
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
So, you're a gay "racist", you probably complain about equal treatment, or wanting respect as well, but you act the same based on someone due to something they can't change vs something they can change. By the same standards you place labels on someone else due to self-esteem and insecurity issues, society easily places you at the bottom, for the same reasons, and I'm sure you aware of it, hence your need for thinking you're entitled to being "better" than someone, even when you realize that you aren't.
- Reply
- Reply
Also, there was much more civilizations before Greeks that did similar things, nothing ever done is new, or original. Finding labels to put on something doesn't change what it is, but only pleases the person using the label to their own ends, in your case, helping you feel better about yourself.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Also me trying to redefine history, not likely, maybe I have a broader sense of history than you do, other than (GREEK GREEK THE WORLD STARTED WITH GREECE) as I said before civilizations are not islands, they take elements from each other, be it people around them, or nature itself.
You're probably one of those people who watch a movie about the middle ages and think things were exactly the way they were by the methods displayed of that movie.
Homosexuality has existed since before man even appeared, pretending Greece was the only place homosexuality was open and occuring is a logical fallacy, civilizations usually record their activities and express themselves through writing.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Or maybe just umad?
- Reply
monkeybeard!
- Reply
Except Vanessa, she is cool beans. Right, Rat?
- Reply
- Reply
Notspam should be applauded in de-Africanizing it, for it is truly God's work.
An argument between some faggot nazi (I didn't even know nazis were allowed to be gay), and some faux-psych major who takes faggot nazis too seriously.
And then original artist steps in a shuts everyone the hell up.
- Reply
mostly sintime's parts actually.
sorry but you contradict yourself too many times, or appear to.
and try to rely on what you consider facts when in fact... or how i should say, it is probably impossible to truly know anything, let alone refer to things as facts
- Reply