Grey-Sahbith: I still think you crossed a line by using Babette, even more so this time than the last. She maybe centures old, but she still has the body of a little, and in this case, a prepubesnt girl. There is nothing appealing about her in the least. Though I have to admit this is a good piece of work. Love lydia with the longer hair this time around.
Anonymous4: @Anonymous: Can't you morons click links? Apparently you can click pics on here, but NOT the blue link up there...LOLI IS A GRAY AREA YOU FUCKTARD! Sheesh.
Anonymous8: so what if it ain't childporn "for" their rules on the matter?
If we think it is child porn and / gross / anything else we have every right to use the comment section to voice our opinion.
And insult you.
So Fuck you matey.
Anon99: @Anonymous: If you dislike it, find it gross, DONT FUCKING CLICK IT, you tard!!! Don't go "OH look, loli" or "oh look, guro!" and click the damn photo..just SKIP it!
Anonymous9: Everyone was so busy arguing about CP that you completely overlooked the horrible vagina on Babette. Can we PLEASE get back to judging the artwork like NORMAL???
Anonymous10: @Anon13: If you think it's child porn, then you're flat out wrong. It's not a debatable issue. "Child porn" is called that for a reason. It's pornography featuring children. Babette is several hundred years old, and therefore by no definition a child. Because she is not a child, images featuring her character cannot be classified as child pornography.
You can think it's gross. That's perfectly fine. You also have every right to call it child pornography if you wish to. However, calling it that is objectively a false statement.
Anonymous11: nope. that is bull. people fap to CP because they are aroused by children's bodies. Who cares how old they are actually as long as they have a child's body? that is nonsense, but a beloved argument by defenders of CP.
( Besides: 18 U.S.C. §2256: the visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.)
Anonymous13: I hate child porn as much as the next guy, but I agree with Anon11, and plus, I'm not even looking at babette, I'm looking at the comments, PS if you didn't see by the thumbnail that it was a kid you need some fucking glasses
Anonymous22: Uhh......Babette is a fictional character. So technically this doesn't qualify as child pornography or toddlercon seeing she's atleast 8. Give it a Loli instead.
Anonymous24: Isn't it hypocritical to hate people who are attracted to immature bodies? Some people are attracted to feet, some to asses, some to the same gender, yet so far no one seems to have a problem with any of those things. The only truly inexcusable thing about CP is that inside that immature body is an immature mind. In this case, however, inside that body is a 300 year old person so fuck right off
Anonymous27: I guess vampirism is like tudors diesase or something pretty much you are way less order on the out side than you on the inside and sucking the blood of your victim helps that :3
Anonymous28: Lol! Love the pic. I'm even enjoying the discussion, but as far as I am concerned, child pornography laws only apply if the child is real and in a provocative position while unclothed or performing a sexual action of any kind. So, think what you want and entertain the next person that decides to read the pointless discussion.
Sirmonocole: Ok, are we all really going to argue over whether or not a FICTIONAL SCENE on a PORN SITE containing a FICTIONAL 300 year old in an 8 year old girl's body pillow fighting another FICTIONAL grown woman in lingerie, is Child pornography? If so your all wasting your time incorrectly quoting the law and the PORN SITE's rules clearly stating: Please be vigilant and report any underage content, if it breaks our rules on the matter. Read the rules first though. Again, FICTIONAL SCENE. And another thing your on a PORN SITE looking up PORN. If your going to be a "Moral-Fag" go to "Deviant-Art.com" and look at pictures of kittens! Also if you don't want to do what has been stated above the if you are going to continue to be a "Moral-Fag" then please use correct spelling and grammar. So you don't look like a retard with a keyboard. Also to make your point more understandable.
Anonymous31: Seriously you guys, if you have nothing better to do with your lives than argue about an (arguably funny) porn picture on a porn site, I feel sorry for you. I really, honestly do. Go get girlfriends, or if that fails, watch different porn. Assholes.
Anonymous35: I'm let all you anons finish, but lemme just say this... THIS IS THE FUNNIEST SHIT I'VE SEEN ON DIS SITE! Now why don't you all fuck off about trying to be moral, you're on a pornographic site looking at skyrim titties, I think you should've gotten moral when you typed in rule34.com...
Anonymous44: Great art.
Child Porn is a visual depictions of an underage child nude or engaging sexual activities. It cannot be anything else than a photography.
Do you see a photography here?
Loli and Child porn are completely different. The former is fictive while the latter is real. No girls were abducted during the drawing of any loli picture, whereas it it the opposite in CP.
I don't understand why people argue over such great art. It's funny as hell.
Anonymous45: lol! well, isnt it the BEST OF BOTH WORLDS?! shes TIGHT and has the BODY of an eight year old, but is OLD ENOUGH, SO THAT IT ISNT ILEGAL?!
Anonymous47: LOL, since when was the rule 34 community so morally right? You're on a site where people are fapping to My Little Pony, maybe this isn't the place for you. Seriously, this is like going to the pirate bay and screaming "OMG ILLEGAL!! SICK FUCKS!"
I'll be nutting to this picture just to spite you idiots.
Anonymous48: Wow, I feel dumber just for reading that arguement. Now allow me to follow the advice of that Brotherhood of Steel outcast and bang rocks together while singing "camptown ladies". Because I'm stupid.
Anonymous53: This quote is taken from the page with Pahaels rules on the matter:
"Under no circumstances will Child Pornography be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS. This includes realistic simulations and fakes, all "fakes" that portray an underage actor / singer etc. They are not permitted and any Child Pornography posters will receive a permanent ban and your relevant information passed onto your local authorities; we cannot stress this enough. UNDERAGE MEANS UNDER 18 YEARS SINCE EXITING THE WOMB" Based on the fact that in the game, it has been WELL over 18 years since Babette left the womb(300 years to be exact) i must come to the conclusion that, Babette does NOT fit under the category "Underage"
- Reply
Very nice pic btw.
- Reply
If you anon idiots can't be bothered to actually even read the sentence, then that's your problem. Stop ruining shit for everyone else.
If we think it is child porn and / gross / anything else we have every right to use the comment section to voice our opinion.
And insult you.
So Fuck you matey.
- Reply
You can think it's gross. That's perfectly fine. You also have every right to call it child pornography if you wish to. However, calling it that is objectively a false statement.
( Besides: 18 U.S.C. §2256: the visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.)
Also Anon 14 is right, she should go see a doctor... or Cryptmaster, whatever
- Reply
Real child pornography.
Realistic 3-dimensional renders
Toddlercon/Babykon@Anonymous: @Anonymous:
- Reply
I am going to masturbate to this either way, and you can't do shit about it.
- Reply
- Reply
(the image)
Child Porn is a visual depictions of an underage child nude or engaging sexual activities. It cannot be anything else than a photography.
Do you see a photography here?
Loli and Child porn are completely different. The former is fictive while the latter is real. No girls were abducted during the drawing of any loli picture, whereas it it the opposite in CP.
I don't understand why people argue over such great art. It's funny as hell.
- Reply
Damn brain having fucking Morals
I'll be nutting to this picture just to spite you idiots.
- Reply
- Reply
as the whole team Edward (vamps)
by themselves Jacob (cuz he would beat eddy so bad)
Lol
"Under no circumstances will Child Pornography be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS. This includes realistic simulations and fakes, all "fakes" that portray an underage actor / singer etc. They are not permitted and any Child Pornography posters will receive a permanent ban and your relevant information passed onto your local authorities; we cannot stress this enough. UNDERAGE MEANS UNDER 18 YEARS SINCE EXITING THE WOMB" Based on the fact that in the game, it has been WELL over 18 years since Babette left the womb(300 years to be exact) i must come to the conclusion that, Babette does NOT fit under the category "Underage"
Other than that, this was actually funny to read, rather than horny. XD I mean if they were all clothed, this would be funny for everyone.
- Reply
Her and Rachel Alucard should hang out.