Please read our Rules and continue to report content that violates our rules on underage content.
main image
avatar
- Reply
x0IGAMERI0x: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbg0ycJGAa0
Your welcome
avatar
- Reply
deathstriker: I allways knew Donald Duck was a perv.
- Reply
Anonymous1: Seth green knows!
- Reply
Anonymous2: Huuhuu Robot Chicken....
avatar
- Reply
Chef_Retardee: Logic.
- Reply
glader: Makes sense to me .
- Reply
Norton: Nice
avatar
- Reply
Nymousano: She´s got a point here...
avatar
- Reply
Masterdragon: best idea ever
- Reply
2456: Well the problem is if she isn't wearing pants, it will be even more obvious they aren't wearing pants.
- Reply
Anonymous3: I'd wish he did more on this one. ^^
- Reply
longtail-the-serperior: I loved that robot chicken bit
- Reply
Anonymous4(3): I think the term is Womouse....
- Reply
Anonymous5: I can see her p-p-p-p-parmesan cheese!
- Reply
Anonymous6: "Because we don't have any genitals."
- Reply
Anonymous7: "Will you take your shirt of if we do then?"
- Reply
Anonymous8: omg i just saw this episode like 5 minutes ago xD
avatar
- Reply
BronyfromBronx: Damn,since I saw that parody episode from Robot Chicken,I was like... "Damn,Gadget makes my balls hot..." LOL
- Reply
Anonymous9: @Anonymous:
Ok Monterey Jack.
- Reply
Anonymous10(9): @BronyfromBronx:
Just seein her makes my Tw@ Wet
- Reply
Goon: excuse me i gotta go to the bathroom!
- Reply
HiNowDie: The double standard is strong in this one.
- Reply
dobby27: first furry crush
- Reply
Fur_Reaper: The problem is that Chip and Dale are covered in fur while Gadget is not. Hence, the former can hide their extremities in plain site and not the latter.

Sorry... I felt a scientific explanation.
- Reply
Anonymous11: Funny because in several child cartoon the male characters have just upper clothing and the female character have full clothing, possibly due to law issue or possible claims against a cartoon with a female character only wearing upper body clothing
- Reply
Anonymous12: Needs Robot Chicken tag.


Report an ad?